Interactive Connectivity Establishment
charter-ietf-ice-01
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2020-03-25
|
01 | Amy Vezza | Responsible AD changed to Murray Kucherawy from Adam Roach |
2019-03-27
|
01 | Cindy Morgan | Responsible AD changed to Adam Roach from Ben Campbell |
2015-10-14
|
01 | (System) | Notify list changed from alissa@cooperw.in, ben@nostrum.com to alissa@cooperw.in |
2015-10-06
|
01 | Amy Vezza | New version available: charter-ietf-ice-01.txt |
2015-10-06
|
00-04 | Amy Vezza | State changed to Approved from IESG review |
2015-10-06
|
00-04 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the charter |
2015-10-06
|
00-04 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2015-10-06
|
00-04 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Ready for external review" ballot |
2015-10-06
|
00-04 | Amy Vezza | WG action text was changed |
2015-10-06
|
00-04 | Amy Vezza | WG action text was changed |
2015-10-05
|
00-04 | Ben Campbell | Changed charter milestone "Submit Dual-stack Fairness with ICE as Proposed Standard draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-dualstack-fairness", set description to "Submit Dual-stack Fairness with ICE as Proposed Standard ", … Changed charter milestone "Submit Dual-stack Fairness with ICE as Proposed Standard draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-dualstack-fairness", set description to "Submit Dual-stack Fairness with ICE as Proposed Standard ", added draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-dualstack-fairness to milestone |
2015-10-05
|
00-04 | Ben Campbell | Changed charter milestone "Submit a revision of ICE (RFC 5245) as Proposed Standard draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc5245bis (draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp remains in MMUSIC) ", set description to … Changed charter milestone "Submit a revision of ICE (RFC 5245) as Proposed Standard draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc5245bis (draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp remains in MMUSIC) ", set description to "Submit a revision of ICE (RFC 5245) as Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp remains in MMUSIC) ", added draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc5245bis to milestone |
2015-10-05
|
00-04 | Ben Campbell | Changed charter milestone "Submit Trickle ICE as Proposed Standard draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice (draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip remains in MMUSIC)", set description to "Submit Trickle ICE as Proposed Standard ( … Changed charter milestone "Submit Trickle ICE as Proposed Standard draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice (draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip remains in MMUSIC)", set description to "Submit Trickle ICE as Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip remains in MMUSIC)", added draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice to milestone |
2015-10-01
|
00-04 | Ben Campbell | New version available: charter-ietf-ice-00-04.txt |
2015-10-01
|
00-03 | Amy Vezza | Created "Approve" ballot |
2015-10-01
|
00-03 | Amy Vezza | State changed to IESG review from Internal review |
2015-10-01
|
00-03 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko |
2015-10-01
|
00-03 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot comment] I like the idea of working to ensure we don't have another fuss about exposing the various IP addresses when that's not wanted. … [Ballot comment] I like the idea of working to ensure we don't have another fuss about exposing the various IP addresses when that's not wanted. I'm not sure if that needs to be in the charter or not. |
2015-10-01
|
00-03 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2015-10-01
|
00-03 | Martin Stiemerling | [Ballot comment] Yes with one question and one comment: - Does the item "congestion control" include the topic of pacing ICE? ICE pacing has been … [Ballot comment] Yes with one question and one comment: - Does the item "congestion control" include the topic of pacing ICE? ICE pacing has been discussed in the past and I am not sure that this has been dealt with in the past or if this is being include in the scope of the ICE WG as a work topic? - Please remove the PPSP WG as this WG will be closed soon, i.e., as soon as the last draft is with the RFC editor. |
2015-10-01
|
00-03 | Martin Stiemerling | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling |
2015-10-01
|
00-03 | Joel Jaeggli | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli |
2015-09-30
|
00-03 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
2015-09-30
|
00-03 | Alvaro Retana | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana |
2015-09-30
|
00-03 | Terry Manderson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Terry Manderson |
2015-09-30
|
00-03 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot comment] The charter is fine as-is, but I would have expected some mention of security as the referenced RFC goes into detail about a … [Ballot comment] The charter is fine as-is, but I would have expected some mention of security as the referenced RFC goes into detail about a number of possible attacks. I put this down as no objection since much of the solution will rely on the protocol this is used for - WebRTC or SIP in the case of the referenced RFC. As long as security is addressed in drafts produced, maybe mention isn't needed in the charter. |
2015-09-30
|
00-03 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty |
2015-09-30
|
00-03 | Alissa Cooper | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper |
2015-09-30
|
00-03 | Alia Atlas | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas |
2015-09-30
|
00-03 | Deborah Brungard | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard |
2015-09-30
|
00-03 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot comment] Just a question for my own edification... How does the address selection mechanism in ICE work/play with the address selection done at the … [Ballot comment] Just a question for my own edification... How does the address selection mechanism in ICE work/play with the address selection done at the IP layer? We have address selection mechanisms described in RFCs 6724 and 6555 (and others) and address selection issues/requirements described in RFCs 5220 and 5221. Not sure how all those fit with a higher-layer protocol making similar decisions. |
2015-09-30
|
00-03 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman |
2015-09-30
|
00-03 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
2015-09-29
|
00-03 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot comment] This is the right thing to do, and I'm fine with the application level work being in ART/ICE while the tooling work remains … [Ballot comment] This is the right thing to do, and I'm fine with the application level work being in ART/ICE while the tooling work remains in TSV/TRAM. I do have one minor comment - is "fairness" the best word that can be used to describe these deliverables? In TSV, it usually means fairness between competing flows, and seems confusing here, at least to me. This seems more like "improved selection" or something. |
2015-09-29
|
00-03 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
2015-09-28
|
00-03 | Ben Campbell | Added charter milestone "Submit a revision of ICE (RFC 5245) as Proposed Standard draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc5245bis (draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp remains in MMUSIC) ", due April 2016 |
2015-09-28
|
00-03 | Ben Campbell | Deleted charter milestone "Submit a revision of ICE (RFC 5245) as Proposed Standard draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc5245bis (draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp remains in MMUSIC)" |
2015-09-28
|
00-03 | Ben Campbell | New version available: charter-ietf-ice-00-03.txt |
2015-09-28
|
00-02 | Alissa Cooper | Notification list changed to alissa@cooperw.in, ben@nostrum.com from "Alissa Cooper" <alcoop@cisco.com>, ben@nostrum.com |
2015-09-24
|
00-02 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot comment] There is still some discussion about whether the SDP pieces should stay in MMUSIC or move to ICE. |
2015-09-24
|
00-02 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ben Campbell |
2015-09-24
|
00-02 | Ben Campbell | Notification list changed to "Alissa Cooper" <alcoop@cisco.com>, ben@nostrum.com |
2015-09-24
|
00-02 | Ben Campbell | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2015-10-01 |
2015-09-24
|
00-02 | Ben Campbell | WG action text was changed |
2015-09-24
|
00-02 | Ben Campbell | WG review text was changed |
2015-09-24
|
00-02 | Ben Campbell | Created "Ready for external review" ballot |
2015-09-24
|
00-02 | Ben Campbell | State changed to Internal review from Informal IESG review |
2015-09-24
|
00-02 | Ben Campbell | New version available: charter-ietf-ice-00-02.txt |
2015-09-24
|
00-01 | Ben Campbell | Responsible AD changed to Ben Campbell from Alissa Cooper |
2015-09-24
|
00-01 | Ben Campbell | Added charter milestone "Submit a revision of ICE (RFC 5245) as Proposed Standard draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc5245bis (draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp remains in MMUSIC)", due April 2016 |
2015-09-24
|
00-01 | Ben Campbell | Added charter milestone "Submit Dual-stack Fairness with ICE as Proposed Standard draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-dualstack-fairness", due January 2016 |
2015-09-24
|
00-01 | Ben Campbell | Added charter milestone "Submit Trickle ICE as Proposed Standard draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice (draft-ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip remains in MMUSIC)", due January 2016 |
2015-09-24
|
00-01 | Ben Campbell | New version available: charter-ietf-ice-00-01.txt |
2015-09-22
|
00-00 | Cindy Morgan | Initial review time expires 2015-09-29 |
2015-09-22
|
00-00 | Cindy Morgan | Creating record for PWG so that a scheduling request for IETF 94 can be made |
2015-09-22
|
00-00 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to Informal IESG review from Not currently under review |
2015-09-22
|
00-00 | Cindy Morgan | New version available: charter-ietf-ice-00-00.txt |