IOT Operations
charter-ietf-iotops-01

• Ready for external review (00-09)
• Approve (00-16)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-16 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"

Alvaro Retana Yes

Just a minor nit: s/new protocols may be needed/new work may be needed

New work will not always require a protocol.

Erik Kline Yes

Martin Duke (was Block) Yes

Thanks for addressing my BLOCK.

I might like the report to also propose some milestones, if that's appropriate.

Robert Wilton Yes

Éric Vyncke Yes

The earlier this WG is chartered the better.

Nevertheless, I wonder why "...issues related to IoT operational security" does not have "taking input and..." as the other bullets?

In "technology related to IoT device and network operations", should "device" be in the plural form ?

Hope this helps

Murray Kucherawy No Objection

Roman Danyliw No Objection

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) (was No Objection) Yes

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) (was No Objection) Yes

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

s/operational practice/operational practices/

(Benjamin Kaduk; former steering group member) No Objection

nit: "includes, but is not limited to," should have two commas.

   IOTOPS provides a venue for IoT experts and other interested parties to engage
   in discussions of operational IoT requirements, as well as proposals for new
   uses of IP technology related to IoT devices and network operations.

Why "IP technology" specifically as opposed "the IP suite" or even "IETF technologies"?

   4) Documenting requirements.

Requirements for what, or perceived as such by whom?