Ballot for charter-ietf-iotops
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-16 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
The earlier this WG is chartered the better. Nevertheless, I wonder why "...issues related to IoT operational security" does not have "taking input and..." as the other bullets? In "technology related to IoT device and network operations", should "device" be in the plural form ? Hope this helps
Just a minor nit: s/new protocols may be needed/new work may be needed New work will not always require a protocol.
Thanks for addressing my BLOCK. I might like the report to also propose some milestones, if that's appropriate.
s/operational practice/operational practices/
nit: "includes, but is not limited to," should have two commas. IOTOPS provides a venue for IoT experts and other interested parties to engage in discussions of operational IoT requirements, as well as proposals for new uses of IP technology related to IoT devices and network operations. Why "IP technology" specifically as opposed "the IP suite" or even "IETF technologies"? 4) Documenting requirements. Requirements for what, or perceived as such by whom?