Skip to main content

IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments
charter-ietf-ipwave-01

Yes

(Alexey Melnikov)
(Alia Atlas)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Ben Campbell)
(Benoît Claise)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Suresh Krishnan)

No Objection

(Jari Arkko)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-02 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"

Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -00-03) Unknown

                            
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -00-03) Unknown

                            
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -00-03) Unknown

                            
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -00-03) Unknown

                            
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -00-03) Unknown

                            
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -00-03) Unknown

                            
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -00-03) Unknown

                            
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -00-03) Unknown

                            
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -00-03) Unknown

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -00-03) Unknown

                            
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2016-10-13 for -00-03) Unknown
Nit: s/network topologies(connectivity)/network topologies (connectivity)./

Comment: Time line of the milestones look slightly strange because the problem statement draft is adopted at the same time when the protocol spec is published. Does that make sense?
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2016-10-13 for -00-03) Unknown
It strikes me that this bit of the charter 

"This group will work on an informational document
that will explain the state of the art in the field and describe
the use cases that will use IPv6 in order to focus the work of
the group. The group will also work on informational document
that describes the problem statement and the associated security
and privacy considerations. The working group will decide at a
future point whether these informational documents need to be
published separately as RFCs or if they maybe combined."

... could lead to lots of wasted time unless the chairs are on
top of things fairly well.  So I hope they  will be:-)