IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments
charter-ietf-ipwave-01

• Ready for external review (00-01)
• Approve (00-02)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-02 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) Yes

(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) Yes

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) Yes

(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) Yes

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) Yes

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) Yes

(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) Yes

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) Yes

(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) Yes

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection

Nit: s/network topologies(connectivity)/network topologies (connectivity)./

Comment: Time line of the milestones look slightly strange because the problem statement draft is adopted at the same time when the protocol spec is published. Does that make sense?

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

It strikes me that this bit of the charter 

"This group will work on an informational document
that will explain the state of the art in the field and describe
the use cases that will use IPv6 in order to focus the work of
the group. The group will also work on informational document
that describes the problem statement and the associated security
and privacy considerations. The working group will decide at a
future point whether these informational documents need to be
published separately as RFCs or if they maybe combined."

... could lead to lots of wasted time unless the chairs are on
top of things fairly well.  So I hope they  will be:-)