Javascript Object Signing and Encryption
charter-ietf-jose-04

Yes

Erik Kline
Paul Wouters
Roman Danyliw
(Robert Wilton)

No Objection

Francesca Palombini
John Scudder
Murray Kucherawy

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02-00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"

Erik Kline
Yes
Paul Wouters
Yes
Roman Danyliw
Yes
Francesca Palombini
No Objection
John Scudder
No Objection
Comment (2022-11-30 for -02-00) Sent 
Basically LGTM. There was one paragraph I found a little stilted, I provide some suggestions below. Take 'em or leave 'em, up to you.

While this sentence is grammatical, IMO it's a little denser to parse than it needs to be: "Concurrent to the growth of adoption of these standards to express and communicate sensitive data has been an increasing societal focus on privacy." Perhaps something like this instead? "As adoption of these standards to express and communicate sensitive data has grown, so too has an increasing societal focus on privacy." (Arguably "grown ... increasing" is redundant and "increasing" could be dropped but I don't think it hurts if you want to emphasize by repetition.)

For similar reasons maybe reword "Common privacy themes in identity solutions are user consent, minimal disclosure, and unlinkability." For example, "User consent, minimal disclosure, and unlinkability are common privacy themes in identity solutions."
Murray Kucherawy
No Objection
Robert Wilton Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (2022-12-01 for -02-00) Sent 
Thanks for a clear and tight charter.