Ballot for charter-ietf-l2sm
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-03 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
A strictly editorial comment: The second sentence in the third paragraph would benefit from being broken into a few shorter sentences.
I have a few editorial suggestions. I think "full system configuration that enable service agility" should be s/enable/enables/. I think "recognized it would be beneficial" would be better as "recognized that it would be beneficial". I think you can drop "attempt to" from "The working group will attempt to derive a single data model". That should be possible, especially if the working group has L3SM for guidance. I think "(that work is expected to be carried out in other protocol-specific working groups)" would be easier to read as a separate sentence, not as a parenthetical insertion.