Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME
charter-ietf-lamps-06
Yes
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Erik Kline
Murray Kucherawy
Éric Vyncke
(Alvaro Retana)
(Lars Eggert)
(Martin Duke)
(Robert Wilton)
- Approve (01-00)
- Ready for external review (01-00)
- Approve (01-00)
- Ready for external review (02-00)
- Approve (02-00)
- Ready for external review (03-00)
- Approve (03-01)
- Ready for external review (04-00)
- Approve (04-01)
- Ready for external review (05-00)
- Approve (05-01)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05-00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"
Roman Danyliw
Yes
Erik Kline
No Objection
John Scudder
No Objection
Comment
(2021-04-22 for -05-00)
Sent
This looks fine AFAICT, although I share Ben’s misgivings about the milestones.
Murray Kucherawy
No Objection
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05-00)
Not sent
Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2021-04-21 for -05-00)
Sent
Do we need to expand or qualify (US) NIST? If I read this properly, for 5.a we have to wait for NIST (since we will use their OIDs), but for 5.b we could in theory go faster, if CFRG produces something sooner. But for 5.b we still have to wait for at least one of NIST and CFRG, right? The proposed milestones put a lot of work in September; is that achievable?
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05-00)
Not sent
Martin Duke Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05-00)
Not sent
Robert Wilton Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05-00)
Not sent