Ballot for charter-ietf-lamps
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07-00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"
The charter should perhaps be rewritten as most of the text is about LAMPS being a brand new WG, which it is no more ;-) More seriously, I find `The LAMPS WG is now tackling these topics which will be published as Standards Track, BCP, or Informational` rather vague as it covers everything rather than being specific by work items.
Thanks for the update to cover the different document tracks through which the WG may publish documents. Please pull in the existing WG milestones (most of which are not yet done) so they don't get lost.