Locator/ID Separation Protocol
charter-ietf-lisp-05

Yes

Jim Guichard
Paul Wouters

No Objection

Erik Kline
John Scudder
Murray Kucherawy
Roman Danyliw
Éric Vyncke
(Martin Duke)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04-06 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"

Jim Guichard
Yes
Paul Wouters
Yes
Erik Kline
No Objection
Comment (2024-01-03 for -04-06) Not sent 
* Does the applicability text have to be in a separate document, or
  can it be part of another document, e.g. if it's not too lengthy?
John Scudder
No Objection
Comment (2024-01-03 for -04-06) Sent 
“LISP deployments could benefit from more advanced internet-working”

Should this be “interworking”? If not, why not?

Editorial: 

s/identified by the working as main LISP applications/identified by the working group as main LISP applications/ (add “group”)

s/The management of LISP protocol and deployments include data models, OAM/The management of LISP protocol and deployments including data models, OAM/ (“include” should be “including”)

s/LISP tunnel endpoints are separated from by a NAT/LISP tunnel endpoints are separated from one another by a NAT/ (add “one another”)

s/leveraging on/leveraging/ (remove “on”)
Murray Kucherawy
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
(was Block) No Objection
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Martin Duke Former IESG member
(was Block) No Objection
No Objection (2024-01-05 for -04-09) Sent 
Thanks for addressing my BLOCK. It's good to understand that they are going to develop a new NAT traversal technique rather than appropriate an existing one.