Ballot for charter-ietf-lpwan
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"
I support this work...modulo the question about whether the supporting document needs to be published.
Full disclosure: I may be participating in this WG as the bit of my university currently sponsoring me are building a LPWA testbed (mainly LoRa initially). I'd have said yes anyway though:-)
Does the informational document necessarily need to be an RFC? It sounds like this might be a case where the WG could leave its options open as to whether to publish that document or not once it is complete.
I support Alissa's comment. Is the proposed informational document something that will have archival value once the standards track work completes, or just a step towards the standard track work?