Link State Routing
charter-ietf-lsr-01

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-09 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"

(Alia Atlas) Yes

(Spencer Dawkins) Yes

Comment (2018-02-19 for -00-09)
No email
send info
I'm sorry I didn't notice this during internal review, but 

"The LSR Working Group is formed by merging the isis and ospf WGs and will take on all their existing adopted work at the time of chartering"

will seem odd after the working group is chartered, because it's present/future tense. Just guessing, but perhaps something like 

"The LSR Working Group was formed by merging the isis and ospf WGs and assigning all their existing adopted work at the time of chartering to LSR"

?

(Terry Manderson) Yes

Alvaro Retana Yes

Deborah Brungard No Objection

Comment (2018-02-21 for -00-11)
No email
send info
Nit:
1st milestone Duall/s/Dual

(Ben Campbell) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

Comment (2018-02-21 for -00-10)
No email
send info
OLD:
3) YANG models for IS-IS, OSPFv2, and OSPFv3 and extensions

NEW:
3) YANG models for the management IS-IS, OSPFv2, and OSPFv3 and extensions

This might look like a picky editorial comment, but I want to make sure that not only configuration but also operational are covered, for the full management.

Alissa Cooper No Objection

(Suresh Krishnan) No Objection

(Mirja Kühlewind) No Objection

(Alexey Melnikov) No Objection

(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection

Comment (2018-02-21 for -00-11)
No email
send info
I don't see any mention of security.  Is there work to be done?  I would think there would be considerations minimally.

Thanks.

(Adam Roach) No Objection