Review of Short Mail-related Extension Proposals
|Document||Charter||Review of Short Mail-related Extension Proposals WG (mailrev)|
|Title||Review of Short Mail-related Extension Proposals|
|Charter edit AD||(None)|
|Send notices to||(None)|
Thare are a number of short mail-related individual submissions which appear not to require the review of a full working group, but would benefit from some review and a sense of rough concensus. Each draft on the agenda will be allocated a fixed (and enforced) time limit for a brief presentation and technical debate. At the end of the time limit, the rough concensus of the room will be measured to see if the draft in question should go standards track expediously, standards track with revisions, experimental, punt to WG, defer or discourage. The success of this effort is likely to depend on the number of participants who read the drafts in advance. Most of these drafts are short. Draft authors are requested to prepare one overhead transparency to summarize their proposals. Some of the drafts listed below could get IESG approval prior to the BOF, in which case they will be dropped from the agenda. The purpose of including drafts in last call on the list is that if they're not approved by the time the BOF occurs, then the BOF may give review feedback to ADs which could help speed approval.