Skip to main content

Multiplexed Application Substrate over QUIC Encryption
charter-ietf-masque-03-00

Yes

(Paul Wouters)

No Objection

Jim Guichard
Roman Danyliw
(John Scudder)
(Murray Kucherawy)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02-01 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"

Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Comment (2024-02-20 for -02-01) Sent
Proxying Ethernet frames over MASQUE is a good idea, and I am supportive. Please consider the following comments as a way to improve the project.

1) why limiting to Ethernet only ? Why not trying to be more generic (at least 802.11 frames but also any layer-2 PDU) ? Possibly with other I-Ds

2) beyond coordination with IEEE (or other layer-2 SDO), should intarea WG also be consulted (as it covers sub-IP layers) ?

About draft-ietf-masque-connect-ethernet, I am really surprised to see that this I-D has been adopted in contradiction to the current charter. I would also suggest that the document borrows from L2TPv3 and others rather than only from connect-udp as layer-2 is a different beast.

Hope this helps this good idea
Jim Guichard
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Martin Duke Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (2024-02-26 for -02-02) Sent for earlier
This is a minor edit to add CONNECT-ETHERNET and coordination with IEEE 802.3.

26 Feb: Updated coordination requirements in accordance with Eric V's review.
Paul Wouters Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -02-02) Not sent

                            
Zaheduzzaman Sarker Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (2024-02-28 for -02-02) Not sent
I will just note that milestones are missing.
Erik Kline Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2024-02-26 for -02-02) Sent
# Internet AD comments for charter-ietf-masque-02-02
CC @ekline

* comment syntax:
  - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md

* "Handling Ballot Positions":
  - https://ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/

## Nits

* Don't think it's necessary to get overly specific about IEEE 802.3.
  RFC 7241, and RFCs 7042 and its -bis, all just use the phrase "IEEE 802".
John Scudder Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -02-02) Not sent

                            
Murray Kucherawy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -02-02) Not sent