Multiplexed Application Substrate over QUIC Encryption
charter-ietf-masque-03-00
Yes
(Paul Wouters)
No Objection
Jim Guichard
Roman Danyliw
(John Scudder)
(Murray Kucherawy)
- Ready for external review (00-00)
- Approve (00-01)
- Ready for external review (01-00)
- Approve (01-01)
- Ready for external review (02-01)
- Approve (02-02)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02-01 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Comment
(2024-02-20 for -02-01)
Sent
Proxying Ethernet frames over MASQUE is a good idea, and I am supportive. Please consider the following comments as a way to improve the project. 1) why limiting to Ethernet only ? Why not trying to be more generic (at least 802.11 frames but also any layer-2 PDU) ? Possibly with other I-Ds 2) beyond coordination with IEEE (or other layer-2 SDO), should intarea WG also be consulted (as it covers sub-IP layers) ? About draft-ietf-masque-connect-ethernet, I am really surprised to see that this I-D has been adopted in contradiction to the current charter. I would also suggest that the document borrows from L2TPv3 and others rather than only from connect-udp as layer-2 is a different beast. Hope this helps this good idea
Jim Guichard
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Martin Duke Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2024-02-26 for -02-02)
Sent for earlier
This is a minor edit to add CONNECT-ETHERNET and coordination with IEEE 802.3. 26 Feb: Updated coordination requirements in accordance with Eric V's review.
Paul Wouters Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -02-02)
Not sent
Zaheduzzaman Sarker Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2024-02-28 for -02-02)
Not sent
I will just note that milestones are missing.
Erik Kline Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2024-02-26 for -02-02)
Sent
# Internet AD comments for charter-ietf-masque-02-02 CC @ekline * comment syntax: - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md * "Handling Ballot Positions": - https://ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ ## Nits * Don't think it's necessary to get overly specific about IEEE 802.3. RFC 7241, and RFCs 7042 and its -bis, all just use the phrase "IEEE 802".
John Scudder Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02-02)
Not sent
Murray Kucherawy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02-02)
Not sent