MBONE Deployment
charter-ietf-mboned-05

Yes

Ketan Talaulikar
Mohamed Boucadair

No Objection

Andy Newton
Deb Cooley
Erik Kline
Gorry Fairhurst
Mahesh Jethanandani
Orie Steele
Paul Wouters
Roman Danyliw

Abstain

Éric Vyncke

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04-04 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"

Ketan Talaulikar
Yes
Mohamed Boucadair
Yes
Andy Newton
No Objection
Deb Cooley
No Objection
Erik Kline
No Objection
Gorry Fairhurst
No Objection
Mahesh Jethanandani
No Objection
Orie Steele
No Objection
Paul Wouters
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Éric Vyncke
Abstain
Comment (2025-07-09 for -04-04) Sent 
As I was convinced to remove my previous BLOCK, I cannot really BLOCK it again.

But, I can only ballot ABSTAIN because I fail to understand *why* the charter does not specify the intended status of each deliverable in order to have a well-defined scope. This is as simple as:
```
.. will include the following work areas *with a publication intended status of standard track except when noted*:
Receive regular reports on the current state of the deployment of multicast technology *(not to be published as a RFC)*
Document deployment of multicast routing in the global Internet *(as an informational RFC)*
Capture the operational experience of those who have deployed and are deploying various multicast technologies *(as an informational RFC)*
Identify, develop, and maintain mechanisms to address transport-layer and security-related gaps that hinder broader multicast deployment....
```