Media Type Maintenance
charter-ietf-mediaman-01

Yes

Francesca Palombini
Murray Kucherawy

No Objection

Erik Kline
Roman Danyliw
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
Éric Vyncke
(Alvaro Retana)
(Benjamin Kaduk)
(Martin Duke)
(Martin Vigoureux)
(Robert Wilton)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-02 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"

Francesca Palombini
Yes
Comment (2021-06-30 for -00-02) Sent 
    This last item will consider the existing use of GitHub for managing
    registrations and the processing queues for the “link relations” and “well
    known URIs” registries as examples.

One minor comment: should this be "Link Relations Type" registry https://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml#link-relations-1 , and (minor typo) "Well-Known URIs" registry https://www.iana.org/assignments/well-known-uris/well-known-uris.xhtml#well-known-uris-1?

Francesca
Murray Kucherawy
Yes
Erik Kline
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment (2021-06-30 for -00-02) Not sent 
If there is an existing GitHub repo being used to manage registrations, consider adding an explicit pointer under "input documents".
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
No Objection
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Comment (2021-07-01 for -00-02) Sent 
I share Rob's concerns about creating a WG for a rather small (to my eyes) work.

I really wonder about the inclusion of draft-muthusamy-dispatch-haptics as a work items for this WG. Why make an exception ? I guess that this I-D was the starting point starting the discussion but it feels really like out of topic and including it in the charter is really weird. 

-éric
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -00-02) Not sent 

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (2021-06-30 for -00-02)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Sent
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                
It is frequently unclear that committing to "base" WG work on a specific
individual I-D is warranted, as opposed to using it as input, etc.

Are there pending proposals relating to media types for programming
languages that motivate prioritizing such work over reviewing the
structure of the registry and the registration procedures?

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Martin Duke Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (for -00-02)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Not sent
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Martin Vigoureux Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (for -00-02)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Not sent
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Robert Wilton Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (2021-07-01 for -00-02)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Sent
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                
I have no objection to the work that is proposed here, or the charter text.  But I wonder whether it might be useful to have a broader discussion about the number of WGs that we have (or are creating), and whether creating lots of small focused WGs ends up making scheduling harder and increases the number of conflicts.