More Instant Messaging Interoperability
charter-ietf-mimi-01
Yes
Erik Kline
John Scudder
Murray Kucherawy
Paul Wouters
(Robert Wilton)
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
(Alvaro Retana)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-02 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
Erik Kline
Yes
John Scudder
Yes
Murray Kucherawy
Yes
Paul Wouters
Yes
Éric Vyncke
Yes
Comment
(2023-02-01 for -00-02)
Sent
A very much needed interoperation between IM systems! So, I can only applaud the effort. The charter is really easy to read, may I add some comments below: "assuming the use of MLS for key establishment." is a little ambiguous, is it in all individual participating IMs or only between IMs ? Perhaps due to the Belgian sensitivity about "federation" ("fédération" in French means that there is still an overarching authority), and I appreciate that the terms "federated identities" are commonly used, is there any better term ? ("conglomerate" sounds negative ;-) ). Feel free to ignore this Belgian/French comment. Again my French is probably hitting, should "Express and implied user preferences" be replaced by "Expressed/explicit and implied user preferences" ? I am afraid that in 2023, there are more than "plain text" (suggest to add media) in "including plain and rich text" I like the concept of "extensible baseline" (is it an oxymoron? ;-) ), but let's keep it: this is a moving target and every human being starts by crawling before walking and running. Should there be a "1:n" between "both 1:1 and multiparty messaging" ?
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
No Objection
Robert Wilton Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -00-02)
Not sent
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-02)
Not sent
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2023-01-31 for -00-02)
Sent
# GEN AD review of charter-ietf-mimi-00-02 CC @larseggert ## Comments ### Chair Will there be a second chair? ## Notes This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the [`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into individual GitHub issues. Review generated by the [`ietf-reviewtool`][IRT]. [ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md [ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments [IRT]: https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool