Ballot for charter-ietf-mlcodec
Summary: Has enough positions to pass.
Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"
Balloting yes, because I'm a big fan of the OPUS work - since the codec seems to be better than all the alternatives in every way ... I think that the charter is fine as it is, but I have a couple of minor comments: - Is there any formal definition for what "low bitrates" actually means for speech and/or music (if the values differ for both)? - Is there any formal definition for what "very low bitrates" actually means for redundancy information.