Skip to main content

Machine Learning for Audio Coding
charter-ietf-mlcodec-01

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2023-06-26
01 Amy Vezza New version available: charter-ietf-mlcodec-01.txt
2023-06-26
00-01 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved from External Review (Message to Community, Selected by Secretariat)
2023-06-26
00-01 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the charter
2023-06-26
00-01 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2023-06-26
00-01 Amy Vezza WG action text was changed
2023-06-22
00-01 Andrew Alston [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Andrew Alston
2023-06-21
00-01 Roman Danyliw [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Roman Danyliw
2023-06-20
00-01 Jim Guichard [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jim Guichard
2023-06-20
00-01 Éric Vyncke
[Ballot comment]
s/adopting encumbered technologies/adopting IPR encumbered technologies/ ?

Also, I find the charter quite vague about the use of Machine Learning. The only mention …
[Ballot comment]
s/adopting encumbered technologies/adopting IPR encumbered technologies/ ?

Also, I find the charter quite vague about the use of Machine Learning. The only mention is
  "Although it is likely that machine learning will be
    required to meet the objectives above, classical solutions will also be
    considered if they can achieve similar performance."
2023-06-20
00-01 Éric Vyncke [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Éric Vyncke
2023-06-19
00-01 Robert Wilton [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Robert Wilton
2023-06-18
00-01 Paul Wouters [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Paul Wouters
2023-06-15
00-01 Erik Kline [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Erik Kline
2023-06-14
00-01 Martin Duke [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Duke
2023-06-09
00-01 Cindy Morgan Telechat date has been changed to 2023-06-22 from 2023-06-08
2023-06-09
00-01 Cindy Morgan Created "Approve" ballot
2023-06-09
00-01 Cindy Morgan Closed "Ready for external review" ballot
2023-06-09
00-01 Cindy Morgan State changed to External Review (Message to Community, Selected by Secretariat) from Start Chartering/Rechartering (Internal Steering Group/IAB Review)
2023-06-09
00-01 Cindy Morgan WG new work message text was changed
2023-06-09
00-01 Cindy Morgan WG review text was changed
2023-06-09
00-01 Cindy Morgan WG review text was changed
2023-06-09
00-01 Cindy Morgan WG review text was changed
2023-06-09
00-01 Cindy Morgan WG review text was changed
2023-06-09
00-01 Cindy Morgan WG review text was changed
2023-06-08
00-01 Zaheduzzaman Sarker [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Zaheduzzaman Sarker
2023-06-08
00-01 Andrew Alston [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Andrew Alston
2023-06-07
00-01 Roman Danyliw [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Roman Danyliw
2023-06-06
00-01 Paul Wouters [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Paul Wouters
2023-06-05
00-01 Erik Kline [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Erik Kline
2023-06-05
00-01 Jim Guichard [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jim Guichard
2023-06-02
00-01 Martin Duke [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Duke
2023-06-01
00-01 Robert Wilton
[Ballot comment]
Balloting yes, because I'm a big fan of the OPUS work - since the codec seems to be better than all the alternatives …
[Ballot comment]
Balloting yes, because I'm a big fan of the OPUS work - since the codec seems to be better than all the alternatives in every way ...

I think that the charter is fine as it is, but I have a couple of minor comments:

- Is there any formal definition for what "low bitrates" actually means for speech and/or music (if the values differ for both)?

- Is there any formal definition for what "very low bitrates" actually means for redundancy information.
2023-06-01
00-01 Robert Wilton Ballot comment text updated for Robert Wilton
2023-06-01
00-01 Robert Wilton
[Ballot comment]
Balloting yes, because I'm a big fan of the OPUS work - since the codec seems to be better than all the alternatives …
[Ballot comment]
Balloting yes, because I'm a big fan of the OPUS work - since the codec seems to be better than all the alternatives in every way ...

I think that the charter is fine as it is, but I have a couple of minor comments:

- Is there any formal definition for what "low bitrates" actually means for speech and/or music (if the values differ for both)?
- Is there any formal definition for what "very low bitrates" actually means for redundancy information.
2023-06-01
00-01 Robert Wilton [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Robert Wilton
2023-05-25
00-01 Murray Kucherawy [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Murray Kucherawy
2023-05-25
00-01 Murray Kucherawy Notification list changed to jmvalin@amazon.com
2023-05-25
00-01 John Scudder [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for John Scudder
2023-05-25
00-01 Amy Vezza Placed on agenda for telechat - 2023-06-08
2023-05-24
00-01 Murray Kucherawy WG action text was changed
2023-05-24
00-01 Murray Kucherawy WG review text was changed
2023-05-24
00-01 Murray Kucherawy WG review text was changed
2023-05-24
00-01 Murray Kucherawy Created "Ready for external review" ballot
2023-05-24
00-01 Murray Kucherawy State changed to Start Chartering/Rechartering (Internal Steering Group/IAB Review) from Draft Charter
2023-05-09
00-01 Murray Kucherawy New version available: charter-ietf-mlcodec-00-01.txt
2023-05-09
00-00 Murray Kucherawy Added charter milestone "Sunmit specification for improving the quality of CELT-coded audio to the IESG as Proposed Standard.", due September 2024
2023-05-09
00-00 Murray Kucherawy Added charter milestone "Submit specification for improving the quality SILK- and hybrid-coded speech to the IESG as Proposed Standard.", due June 2024
2023-05-09
00-00 Murray Kucherawy Added charter milestone "Submit specification for Opus resiliency against packet loss to the IESG as Proposed Standard.", due March 2024
2023-05-09
00-00 Murray Kucherawy Added charter milestone "Submit generic Opus extension mechanism to the IESG as Proposed Standard.", due December 2023
2023-05-03
00-00 Murray Kucherawy Initial review time expires 2023-05-10
2023-05-03
00-00 Murray Kucherawy State changed to Draft Charter from Not currently under review
2023-05-03
00-00 Murray Kucherawy New version available: charter-ietf-mlcodec-00-00.txt