Messaging Layer Security
charter-ietf-mls-02
Yes
Deb Cooley
Erik Kline
Mahesh Jethanandani
Orie Steele
Paul Wouters
No Objection
Francesca Palombini
Jim Guichard
Murray Kucherawy
Warren Kumari
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01-01 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
Deb Cooley
Yes
Erik Kline
Yes
Mahesh Jethanandani
Yes
Orie Steele
Yes
Paul Wouters
Yes
Francesca Palombini
No Objection
Gunter Van de Velde
No Objection
Comment
(2024-10-11 for -01-01)
Not sent
I think that the reduction of MLS introduction (between charter proposal 01-00 and 01-01) is good progress. It makes the charter look more accurate and refreshed.
Jim Guichard
No Objection
John Scudder
No Objection
Comment
(2024-10-17 for -01-01)
Sent
Brevity is the soul of wit. By that metric, this is the wittiest charter I've ever reviewed. Huzzah.
Murray Kucherawy
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment
(2024-10-16 for -01-01)
Sent
Are the seven named extensions intended to be in a single document (draft-ietf-mls-extensions)? If not, please expand the milestone list to cover the expected documents.
Warren Kumari
No Objection
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
No Objection
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Comment
(2024-10-16 for -01-01)
Not sent
Nice text but I *strongly* suggest to indicate the intended status of all the work items; as we all know, there is a big difference between experimental and proposed standards. Let's be clear.