Media OPerationS
charter-ietf-mops-01
Yes
Éric Vyncke
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Alvaro Retana)
(Barry Leiba)
(Magnus Westerlund)
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
(Adam Roach)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Ignas Bagdonas)
(Martin Vigoureux)
(Suresh Krishnan)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-03 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
Éric Vyncke
Yes
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -00-03)
Not sent
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -00-03)
Not sent
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -00-03)
Not sent
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -00-03)
Not sent
Adam Roach Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-03)
Not sent
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-03)
Not sent
Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2019-10-31 for -00-03)
Sent
MOPS will solicit input on operational issues and practices; existing and proposed technologies related to the deployment, engineering, and operation of media streaming and manipulation protocols and procedures in the global Internet; and inter-domain and within-domain networking. In the context of This seems to parse as "solicit input on inter-domain and within-domain networking", which is a rather large scope. I understand that the intent is scoped to media, but the following text doesn't necessarily do so, from a grammatical perspective.
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-03)
Not sent
Ignas Bagdonas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-03)
Not sent
Martin Vigoureux Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-03)
Not sent
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2019-10-30 for -00-03)
Sent
Two small editorial comments: 1) "Internet- and Internet-protocol-delivered media" Not sure I understand the difference here. I would assume that a media that is sent over the Internet would also use some Internet-protocol...? 2)"existing protocols and/or networks are challenged by these updated requirements." "these" seems to be out of context now. And two questions: 1) "If there is no longer sufficient interest in the Working Group in a work item, the item may be removed from the list of Working Group items." Where/how is the list of Working Group Items maintain? Are we talking here about working group documents, or milestones, or something else (in a wiki maybe)? And what does removing mean? That it cannot be discussed on the mailing list anymore? That is will not get any presentation time? Something else? Not sure how easy it will be to enforce these things or what that means in practice... 2) The charter only talks about documenting problems. Does that mean any kind of BCP-like work is out of scope?
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-03)
Not sent