Skip to main content

NETCONF Data Modeling Language
charter-ietf-netmod-09

Yes

(Benoît Claise)

No Objection

(Alexey Melnikov)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Mirja Kühlewind)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Suresh Krishnan)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08-05 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review? Is this charter ready for approval without external review?"

Warren Kumari
No Objection
Comment (2017-04-12 for -08-05) Unknown
Doh. Earlier ballot got lost when version changed....
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (2017-04-12 for -08-05) Unknown
I do think that it would be helpful for this charter to discuss some of the
needed WG interactions.  In particular, where encodings of YANG are
defined elsewhere (i.e. draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-04), there should be
coordination of the impact of changes to the YANG language.  

Another question is where do you see the discussion of device profiles
or sets of YANG modules needed to meet a particular purpose going? To
me, this doesn't read as in scope for this charter and yet I don't think that
we've thought through the right place for them.  I'm ok with continued
discussion for routing-related ones in RTGWG - but not all device profiles
(i.e. a profile of modules needed for a firewall) belong anywhere near Routing.
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -08-05) Unknown

                            
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (2017-04-13 for -08-05) Unknown
The formatting of the introductory paragraph needs to be adjusted.

I think this work is important and could help security area WGs like SACM.
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -08-05) Unknown

                            
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -08-05) Unknown

                            
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2017-04-13 for -08-05) Unknown
It would be useful to explicitly list needed/expected/required interactions with other WGs.
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2017-04-12 for -08-05) Unknown
I lean towards thinking this should have an external review, but I won't insist if others think it is unnecessary.  The vast majority of the text for the old charter is changed.

The milestone dates seem optimistic. Four of them are this month; is that intentional?
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -08-05) Unknown

                            
Eric Rescorla Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2017-04-13 for -08-05) Unknown
As before.
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -08-05) Unknown

                            
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -08-05) Unknown

                            
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -08-05) Unknown