NETCONF Data Modeling Language
charter-ietf-netmod-09

• Ready w/o external review (06-10)
• Ready w/o external review (07-02)
• Ready for external review (08-00)
• Ready w/o external review (08-05)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06-10 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review? Is this charter ready for approval without external review?"

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) Yes

(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) Yes

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) Yes

(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) Yes

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) Yes

(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) Yes

with respect to Peet's dicuss I expect the proposed modification to the text:

   The NETMOD WG may also develop any additional data models written in
   YANG that the WG considers core building blocks and that do not fall
   under the charters of other active IETF working groups. The NETMOD WG
   may simply add such milestones as it sees fit, with the advice and
   consent of the responsible AD.

Is in keeping with the intent. 

The AD and the chairs are expected to engage in good judgement with respect to the work the WG takes on, but the working group should not have to return to the well in order to provide a place to work on  a data model which needs a home. It should not take  on work items that should be housed in other active working groups which again is a judgement call but probably a fairly straight-forward one.

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection

(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection

(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) No Objection

(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) (was Block) No Objection

(Richard Barnes; former steering group member) No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection

One nit ... 

"Oct 2014 - Submit the mapping to JSON to the IESG" may be slightly confusing to some readers, because it's easy to read it as "submit ... to JSON ..." Perhaps "Submit the JSON mapping to the IESG"?

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

(Ted Lemon; former steering group member) No Objection