NETCONF Data Modeling Language
charter-ietf-netmod-09

• Ready w/o external review (06-10)
• Ready w/o external review (07-02)
• Ready for external review (08-00)
• Ready w/o external review (08-05)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08-05 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review? Is this charter ready for approval without external review?"

Alvaro Retana No Objection

It would be useful to explicitly list needed/expected/required interactions with other WGs.

Warren Kumari No Objection

Doh. Earlier ballot got lost when version changed....

(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) Yes

I do think that it would be helpful for this charter to discuss some of the
needed WG interactions.  In particular, where encodings of YANG are
defined elsewhere (i.e. draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-04), there should be
coordination of the impact of changes to the YANG language.  

Another question is where do you see the discussion of device profiles
or sets of YANG modules needed to meet a particular purpose going? To
me, this doesn't read as in scope for this charter and yet I don't think that
we've thought through the right place for them.  I'm ok with continued
discussion for routing-related ones in RTGWG - but not all device profiles
(i.e. a profile of modules needed for a firewall) belong anywhere near Routing.

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) Yes

(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) Yes

The formatting of the introductory paragraph needs to be adjusted.

I think this work is important and could help security area WGs like SACM.

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection

I lean towards thinking this should have an external review, but I won't insist if others think it is unnecessary.  The vast majority of the text for the old charter is changed.

The milestone dates seem optimistic. Four of them are this month; is that intentional?

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection

(Eric Rescorla; former steering group member) No Objection

As before.

(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection

(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) No Objection