Ballot for charter-ietf-onsen

Yes

Mahesh Jethanandani

No Objection

Andy Newton
Éric Vyncke
Gorry Fairhurst
Jim Guichard
Ketan Talaulikar
Roman Danyliw

No Record

Charles Eckel
Christopher Inacio
Deb Cooley
Gunter Van de Velde
Mike Bishop
Mohamed Boucadair
Tommy Jensen

  • Ready for external review (00-00)
  • Approve (00-02)

Summary: Has enough positions to pass.

Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"

Mahesh Jethanandani
Yes
Andy Newton
No Objection
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Comment (2026-06-16) Sent
Some comments:

s/The ONSEN WG aims to make IETF service and network abstractions easier to implement and use, improving automation,/The ONSEN WG aims to make IETF service and network abstractions easier to implement and use, *therefore* improving automation,/

Be specific about the intended publication status for the docs in `The WG may decide that some documents, such as the problem statement, use-cases, scope, and priorities, are not intended for RFC publication and will be maintained as WG documents`

In the list of relationships, aggregate the ones about `BESS/CCAMP/TEAS:`
Gorry Fairhurst
No Objection
Jim Guichard
No Objection
Ketan Talaulikar
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Charles Eckel
No Record
Christopher Inacio
No Record
Deb Cooley
No Record
Gunter Van de Velde
No Record
Mike Bishop
No Record
Mohamed Boucadair
No Record
Comment (2026-06-11 for -00-02) Not sent
I prefer to recuse although I'm not involved in any of the proposed updates that build on work I co-authored.
Tommy Jensen
No Record