Skip to main content

Open Specification for Pretty Good Privacy
charter-ietf-openpgp-04

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2023-12-15
04 Cindy Morgan New version available: charter-ietf-openpgp-04.txt
2023-12-15
03-04 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved from External Review (Message to Community, Selected by Secretariat)
2023-12-15
03-04 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the charter
2023-12-15
03-04 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2023-12-15
03-04 Cindy Morgan WG action text was changed
2023-12-15
03-04 Cindy Morgan WG action text was changed
2023-12-15
03-04 Roman Danyliw New version available: charter-ietf-openpgp-03-04.txt
2023-12-14
03-03 Murray Kucherawy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Murray Kucherawy
2023-12-14
03-03 John Scudder
[Ballot comment]
I think Roman misunderstood my previous comment and removed only the quotation marks I was OK with while leaving all the quotation marks …
[Ballot comment]
I think Roman misunderstood my previous comment and removed only the quotation marks I was OK with while leaving all the quotation marks I was dissing. If you want to, you could get rid of the rest of the quotation marks as a special holiday gift to me, but if you ship it the way it is that's OK too.
2023-12-14
03-03 John Scudder [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for John Scudder
2023-12-14
03-03 Robert Wilton [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Wilton
2023-12-14
03-03 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
# GEN AD review of charter-ietf-openpgp-03-03

CC @larseggert

## Comments

There is no need to use Markdown links for I-Ds and RFC in …
[Ballot comment]
# GEN AD review of charter-ietf-openpgp-03-03

CC @larseggert

## Comments

There is no need to use Markdown links for I-Ds and RFC in
the charter text, the Datatracker will add those automatically.

## Nits

All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to
address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by
automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there
will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you
did with these suggestions.

### Typos

#### Section 3156, paragraph 3
```
- tackling anther topic.
+ tackling another topic.
+            +
```

## Notes

This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the
[`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into
individual GitHub issues. Review generated by the [`ietf-reviewtool`][IRT].

[ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md
[ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments
[IRT]: https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool
2023-12-14
03-03 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Lars Eggert
2023-12-14
03-03 Andrew Alston [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Andrew Alston
2023-12-14
03-03 Éric Vyncke [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Éric Vyncke
2023-12-13
03-03 Erik Kline [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Erik Kline
2023-12-13
03-03 Paul Wouters [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Paul Wouters
2023-12-13
03-03 Jim Guichard [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jim Guichard
2023-12-13
03-03 Francesca Palombini [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Francesca Palombini
2023-12-12
03-03 Martin Duke [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Duke
2023-12-12
03-03 Zaheduzzaman Sarker [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Zaheduzzaman Sarker
2023-12-04
03-03 Roman Danyliw [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Roman Danyliw
2023-12-04
03-03 Cindy Morgan Telechat date has been changed to 2023-12-14 from 2023-11-30
2023-12-04
03-03 Cindy Morgan Created "Approve" ballot
2023-12-04
03-03 Cindy Morgan Closed "Ready for external review" ballot
2023-12-04
03-03 Cindy Morgan State changed to External Review (Message to Community, Selected by Secretariat) from Start Chartering/Rechartering (Internal Steering Group/IAB Review)
2023-12-04
03-03 Cindy Morgan WG new work message text was changed
2023-12-04
03-03 Cindy Morgan WG review text was changed
2023-12-04
03-03 Cindy Morgan WG review text was changed
2023-12-04
03-03 Cindy Morgan WG review text was changed
2023-12-04
03-03 Roman Danyliw New version available: charter-ietf-openpgp-03-03.txt
2023-12-04
03-02 Roman Danyliw New version available: charter-ietf-openpgp-03-02.txt
2023-12-04
03-01 Roman Danyliw New version available: charter-ietf-openpgp-03-01.txt
2023-11-30
03-00 Murray Kucherawy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Murray Kucherawy
2023-11-30
03-00 Francesca Palombini [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Francesca Palombini
2023-11-29
03-00 Paul Wouters
[Ballot comment]
The proposed work are good items, postponed earlier to focus on the crypto-refresh.
The list is a bit long and ambitious, but I …
[Ballot comment]
The proposed work are good items, postponed earlier to focus on the crypto-refresh.
The list is a bit long and ambitious, but I guess that is countered by incomplete and variable Milestones :)
2023-11-29
03-00 Paul Wouters [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Paul Wouters
2023-11-29
03-00 John Scudder
[Ballot comment]
Overall this looks great. I have a couple very small editorial issues you may want to address.

- I think all the uses …
[Ballot comment]
Overall this looks great. I have a couple very small editorial issues you may want to address.

- I think all the uses of quotation marks other than the final two quoted things ("Completion" and "parked WG document") are spurious. I realize this is an exceedingly minor point, but it's a pet peeve.

- I suggest

OLD:
For all work items will required demonstration

NEW:
All work items will require demonstration
2023-11-29
03-00 John Scudder [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for John Scudder
2023-11-28
03-00 Zaheduzzaman Sarker [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Zaheduzzaman Sarker
2023-11-28
03-00 Robert Wilton [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Wilton
2023-11-27
03-00 Martin Duke [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Duke
2023-11-27
03-00 Jim Guichard [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jim Guichard
2023-11-25
03-00 Éric Vyncke
[Ballot comment]
As a starting note, I am a big fan of PGP for its decentralised approach.

Please expand PQC, unsure whether "domain separation" is …
[Ballot comment]
As a starting note, I am a big fan of PGP for its decentralised approach.

Please expand PQC, unsure whether "domain separation" is well understood (at least not to me), HKP/WKD: suggest to use the acronyms *after* their expansions, I like the use of "e.g., use ... as initial input" (except perhaps I would have used "perhaps" rather than "e.g."

Thank you for having "above" in `The WG chairs will periodically poll the WG for which of the topics above to add as milestones` else this could lead to a too flexible too open charter where WG chairs can add *any* item.
2023-11-25
03-00 Éric Vyncke [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Éric Vyncke
2023-11-12
03-00 Erik Kline
[Ballot comment]
# Internet AD comments for charter-ietf-openpgp-03-00
CC @ekline

* comment syntax:
  - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md

## Nits

### "Working Group Process"

* "For all …
[Ballot comment]
# Internet AD comments for charter-ietf-openpgp-03-00
CC @ekline

* comment syntax:
  - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md

## Nits

### "Working Group Process"

* "For all work items will required demonstration of interoperable ..."

  didn't quite scan correctly for me.  Perhaps something like:

  "For all work items, demonstration of interoperability will be required..."
2023-11-12
03-00 Erik Kline [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Erik Kline
2023-11-09
03-00 Roman Danyliw
[Ballot comment]
Note: this charter contains a number of links.  When viewed in the "charter review" datatracker page (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-openpgp/), this text will be …
[Ballot comment]
Note: this charter contains a number of links.  When viewed in the "charter review" datatracker page (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-openpgp/), this text will be unrendered Markdown making the text difficult to read.  Please realize that if this charter is approved, it would be shown in the "WG view" of the WG (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/openpgp/about/) which will render the markdown correctly.
2023-11-09
03-00 Roman Danyliw [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Roman Danyliw
2023-11-09
03-00 Roman Danyliw Telechat date has been changed to 2023-11-30 from 2020-12-17
2023-11-09
03-00 Roman Danyliw WG action text was changed
2023-11-09
03-00 Roman Danyliw WG review text was changed
2023-11-09
03-00 Roman Danyliw WG review text was changed
2023-11-09
03-00 Roman Danyliw Created "Ready for external review" ballot
2023-11-09
03-00 Roman Danyliw State changed to Start Chartering/Rechartering (Internal Steering Group/IAB Review) from Draft Charter
2023-11-09
03-00 Roman Danyliw Added charter milestone "Call for adoption of drafts related to WKD and/or HKP to produce a proposed standard RFC", due June 2024
2023-11-09
03-00 Roman Danyliw Added charter milestone "Call for adoption of drafts related to persistent symmetric keys to produce a proposed standard RFC", due March 2024
2023-11-09
03-00 Roman Danyliw Added charter milestone "Call for adoption of drafts related to superseded keys to produce a proposed standard RFC", due March 2024
2023-11-09
03-00 Roman Danyliw Added charter milestone "Call for adoption of drafts related to post quantum cryptography to produce a proposed standard RFC", due January 2024
2023-11-09
03-00 Roman Danyliw State changed to Draft Charter from Approved
2023-11-09
03-00 Roman Danyliw New version available: charter-ietf-openpgp-03-00.txt
2022-03-23
03 Amy Vezza Responsible AD changed to Roman Danyliw from Benjamin Kaduk
2020-12-18
03 Cindy Morgan New version available: charter-ietf-openpgp-03.txt
2020-12-18
02-03 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved from External Review (Message to Community, Selected by Secretariat)
2020-12-18
02-03 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the charter
2020-12-18
02-03 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2020-12-18
02-03 Cindy Morgan WG action text was changed
2020-12-18
02-03 Cindy Morgan WG action text was changed
2020-12-17
02-03 Robert Wilton [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Robert Wilton
2020-12-17
02-03 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot comment]
What is the definition of un-interested party? By reviewing are they not sufficiently interested to be an "interested party"?
2020-12-17
02-03 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Magnus Westerlund
2020-12-17
02-03 Alvaro Retana [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana
2020-12-17
02-03 Martin Vigoureux [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Martin Vigoureux
2020-12-16
02-03 Roman Danyliw [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Roman Danyliw
2020-12-16
02-03 Martin Duke [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Duke
2020-12-15
02-03 Deborah Brungard [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard
2020-12-13
02-03 Murray Kucherawy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Murray Kucherawy
2020-12-13
02-03 Erik Kline [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Erik Kline
2020-12-07
02-03 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2020-12-02
02-03 Benjamin Kaduk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Benjamin Kaduk
2020-11-26
02-03 Cindy Morgan Telechat date has been changed to 2020-12-17 from 2020-11-05
2020-11-26
02-03 Cindy Morgan WG new work message text was changed
2020-11-26
02-03 Cindy Morgan WG review text was changed
2020-11-26
02-03 Cindy Morgan WG review text was changed
2020-11-26
02-03 Cindy Morgan WG review text was changed
2020-11-25
02-03 Benjamin Kaduk Created "Approve" ballot
2020-11-25
02-03 Benjamin Kaduk Closed "Ready for external review" ballot
2020-11-25
02-03 Benjamin Kaduk State changed to External Review (Message to Community, Selected by Secretariat) from Start Chartering/Rechartering (Internal Steering Group/IAB Review)
2020-11-25
02-03 Benjamin Kaduk New version available: charter-ietf-openpgp-02-03.txt
2020-11-25
02-03 Benjamin Kaduk New version available: charter-ietf-openpgp-02-03.txt
2020-11-05
02-02 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Magnus Westerlund
2020-11-05
02-02 Alissa Cooper [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper
2020-11-05
02-02 Robert Wilton
[Ballot comment]
> Furthermore, the working group will accept no I-D's as working group
> items unless there is a review by at least two …
[Ballot comment]
> Furthermore, the working group will accept no I-D's as working group
> items unless there is a review by at least two un-interested parties of
> the I-D as part of the acceptance process.

Does this mean that the working group won't adopt any IDs as working group items unless it has been reviewed by two un-interested parties?  If so, perhaps change accept/acceptance to adopt/adoption?
2020-11-05
02-02 Robert Wilton Ballot comment text updated for Robert Wilton
2020-11-05
02-02 Robert Wilton
[Ballot comment]
> Furthermore, the working group will accept no I-D's as working group
> items unless there is a review by at least two …
[Ballot comment]
> Furthermore, the working group will accept no I-D's as working group
> items unless there is a review by at least two un-interested parties of
> the I-D as part of the acceptance process.

Does this mean that the working group won't adopt any IDs as working group items unless it has been reviewed by two un-interested parties?  Or does this mean that the WG won't entertain discussion on an I-D unless it has been reviewed by two un-interested parties.
2020-11-05
02-02 Robert Wilton [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Wilton
2020-11-05
02-02 Éric Vyncke
[Ballot comment]
While I support the creation of the WG, I have some comments on the charter:

1) is it necessary to include the first …
[Ballot comment]
While I support the creation of the WG, I have some comments on the charter:

1) is it necessary to include the first four paragraphs about the history ?

2) the charter insists on 'no delay' but the previous version of the charter is dated 2015... ;-)

3) is the word 'entertain' the right one in "OpenPGP may be entertained by the working group" ? For a non-English speaker, the word 'entertain' is about getting fun but there seems to be other meaning

4) in"the working group will accept no I-D" s/accept/adopt/ ?

5) I do not know about the context, but the last paragraph looks to me like requesting a WGLC before adoption. Also, it requires two reviews but what will happen if those two reviews are negative ?
2020-11-05
02-02 Éric Vyncke [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Éric Vyncke
2020-11-04
02-02 Benjamin Kaduk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Benjamin Kaduk
2020-11-04
02-02 Martin Duke [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Duke
2020-11-04
02-02 Deborah Brungard [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard
2020-11-04
02-02 Benjamin Kaduk New version available: charter-ietf-openpgp-02-02.txt
2020-11-04
02-01 Alvaro Retana [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana
2020-10-29
02-01 Erik Kline [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Erik Kline
2020-10-28
02-01 Roman Danyliw [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Roman Danyliw
2020-10-27
02-01 Murray Kucherawy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Murray Kucherawy
2020-10-21
02-01 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2020-10-20
02-01 Cindy Morgan Telechat date has been changed to 2020-11-05 from 2015-06-25
2020-10-20
02-01 Benjamin Kaduk WG action text was changed
2020-10-20
02-01 Benjamin Kaduk WG review text was changed
2020-10-20
02-01 Benjamin Kaduk WG review text was changed
2020-10-20
02-01 Benjamin Kaduk Created "Ready for external review" ballot
2020-10-20
02-01 Benjamin Kaduk State changed to Start Chartering/Rechartering (Internal Steering Group/IAB Review) from Draft Charter
2020-10-20
02-01 Benjamin Kaduk New version available: charter-ietf-openpgp-02-01.txt
2020-10-20
02-00 Benjamin Kaduk Added charter milestone "submit RFC 4880 revision to the IESG", due June 2021
2020-10-20
02-00 Benjamin Kaduk Initial review time expires 2020-11-03
2020-10-20
02-00 Benjamin Kaduk State changed to Draft Charter from Approved
2020-10-20
02-00 Benjamin Kaduk New version available: charter-ietf-openpgp-02-00.txt
2020-10-20
02 Benjamin Kaduk Responsible AD changed to Benjamin Kaduk from Stephen Farrell
2015-06-26
02 Cindy Morgan New version available: charter-ietf-openpgp-02.txt
2015-06-26
02 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved from IESG review
2015-06-26
02 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the charter
2015-06-26
02 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2015-06-26
02 Cindy Morgan Closed "Ready for external review" ballot
2015-06-26
01-05 Cindy Morgan WG action text was changed
2015-06-26
01-05 Cindy Morgan New version to fix/add line breaks
2015-06-26
01-05 Cindy Morgan New version available: charter-ietf-openpgp-01-05.txt
2015-06-25
01-04 Kathleen Moriarty New version available: charter-ietf-openpgp-01-04.txt
2015-06-25
01-03 Benoît Claise
[Ballot comment]
"CRFG curves". Certainly some sort of elliptic curves for cryptography I don't know anything about.
Google pointed to me: CRFG - Chronic Renal …
[Ballot comment]
"CRFG curves". Certainly some sort of elliptic curves for cryptography I don't know anything about.
Google pointed to me: CRFG - Chronic Renal Failure Gene
Until I realized it was the research group :-)

Pure editorial (use it or drop it)
OLD: Potential inclusion of elliptic curves recommended by the CFRG (see note below)
NEW: Potential inclusion of elliptic curves recommended by the Crypto Forum Research Group, CFRG (see note
below)
2015-06-25
01-03 Benoît Claise Ballot comment text updated for Benoit Claise
2015-06-25
01-03 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] Position for Benoit Claise has been changed to No Objection from No Record
2015-06-25
01-03 Benoît Claise
[Ballot comment]
"CRFG curves". Google pointed to me: CRFG - Chronic Renal Failure Gene
Until I realized it was the research group :-)
Might be …
[Ballot comment]
"CRFG curves". Google pointed to me: CRFG - Chronic Renal Failure Gene
Until I realized it was the research group :-)
Might be worth improving...
2015-06-25
01-03 Benoît Claise Ballot comment text updated for Benoit Claise
2015-06-24
01-03 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2015-06-24
01-03 Alia Atlas [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alia Atlas
2015-06-24
01-03 Deborah Brungard [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard
2015-06-24
01-03 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2015-06-24
01-03 Alissa Cooper [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper
2015-06-24
01-03 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2015-06-23
01-03 Ben Campbell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ben Campbell
2015-06-22
01-03 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2015-06-22
01-03 Alvaro Retana [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana
2015-06-22
01-03 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2015-06-22
01-03 Kathleen Moriarty [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty
2015-06-22
01-03 Kathleen Moriarty Created "Approve" ballot
2015-06-22
01-03 Kathleen Moriarty State changed to IESG review from External review
2015-06-18
01-03 Kathleen Moriarty New version available: charter-ietf-openpgp-01-03.txt
2015-06-15
01-02 Amy Vezza State changed to External review from Internal review
2015-06-15
01-02 Amy Vezza Telechat date has been changed to 2015-06-25 from 2015-06-11
2015-06-15
01-02 Amy Vezza WG review text was changed
2015-06-15
01-01 Amy Vezza WG review text was changed
2015-06-15
01-01 Amy Vezza WG review text was changed
2015-06-15
01-01 Amy Vezza WG review text was changed
2015-06-15
01-02 Kathleen Moriarty New version available: charter-ietf-openpgp-01-02.txt
2015-06-11
01-01 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] Position for Benoit Claise has been changed to No Objection from No Record
2015-06-11
01-01 Benoît Claise
[Ballot comment]
Good luck with such an open charter:
- Other work related to OpenPGP may be entertained by the working group as long
as …
[Ballot comment]
Good luck with such an open charter:
- Other work related to OpenPGP may be entertained by the working group as long
as it does not interfere with the completion of the RFC4880 revision. As the revision
of RFC4880 is the primary goal of the working group, other work may be
undertaken, so long as:
1. The work will not unduly delay the closure of the working group after the
revision is finished (unless the working group is rechartered).
2. The work has widespread support in the working group.

This will lead to discussions:
"sure, there will not be much delay, we'll be fast!",
"sure, there is widespread support!" (look at the acknowlegment section :-) )

In OPS, we summarized this as:
Additional work items may only be added with approval
from the responsible Area Director or by re-chartering.
2015-06-11
01-01 Benoît Claise Ballot comment text updated for Benoit Claise
2015-06-11
01-01 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2015-06-10
01-01 Terry Manderson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Terry Manderson
2015-06-10
01-01 Spencer Dawkins
[Ballot comment]
This seemed to read slightly oddly:

"The Working Group will consider CFRG curves as possible Mandatory to
Implement (MTI) based on the output …
[Ballot comment]
This seemed to read slightly oddly:

"The Working Group will consider CFRG curves as possible Mandatory to
Implement (MTI) based on the output of the CFRG and/or Working Group
consensus in the matter."

Is "and/or" right? I'm reading that as saying that Working Group consensus isn't required, and the output of the CFRG is sufficient, and I'm guessing that's not what the text is intended to mean.
2015-06-10
01-01 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2015-06-10
01-01 Kathleen Moriarty [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty
2015-06-10
01-01 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2015-06-10
01-01 Deborah Brungard [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard
2015-06-10
01-01 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2015-06-10
01-01 Stephen Farrell New version available: charter-ietf-openpgp-01-01.txt
2015-06-09
01-00 Ben Campbell
[Ballot comment]
I concur with Alissa's comment about "other work".  Is it possible to put more scope around the "other work" than "The wg wants …
[Ballot comment]
I concur with Alissa's comment about "other work".  Is it possible to put more scope around the "other work" than "The wg wants to do it and it doesn't get in the way"?

Item 2. under "other work" appears to have some missing words. Should that say "The work has widespread support..."?
2015-06-09
01-00 Ben Campbell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ben Campbell
2015-06-08
01-00 Alissa Cooper
[Ballot comment]
This is probably just a drafting issue, but this bit of the charter seems too open-ended:

"- Other work may be entertained by …
[Ballot comment]
This is probably just a drafting issue, but this bit of the charter seems too open-ended:

"- Other work may be entertained by the working group as long as it does
not interfere with the completion of the RFC4880 revision. As the revision
of RFC4880 is the primary goal of the working group, other work may be
undertaken, so long as:

1. Will not unduly delay the closure of the working group after the
revision is finished (unless the working group is rechartered).

2. as widespread support in the working group."

It would be better IMO to characterize what this "other work" might entail or relate to. It may be obvious to the proponents but for someone who has not been following this it sounds like the WG could take up pretty much anything beyond the 4880bis, time and interest permitting.
2015-06-08
01-00 Alissa Cooper [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper
2015-06-08
01-00 Alvaro Retana [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana
2015-06-08
01-00 Cindy Morgan Changed charter title from 'An Open Specification for Pretty Good Privacy' to 'Open Specification for Pretty Good Privacy'.
2015-06-08
01-00 Alia Atlas [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas
2015-06-08
01-00 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2015-06-08
01-00 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2015-06-07
01-00 Barry Leiba [Ballot comment]
Just a question for Stephen:  did you check with the Secretariat that resurrecting a closed WG this way won't cause tools problems?
2015-06-07
01-00 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2015-06-07
01-00 Stephen Farrell WG action text was changed
2015-06-07
01-00 Stephen Farrell WG review text was changed
2015-06-07
01-00 Stephen Farrell Created "Ready for external review" ballot
2015-06-07
01-00 Stephen Farrell State changed to Internal review from Informal IESG review
2015-06-07
01-00 Stephen Farrell Added charter milestone "RFC4880bis wg-id final call", due July 2016
2015-06-07
01-00 Stephen Farrell Added charter milestone "First wg-id for RFC4880bis", due February 2016
2015-06-07
01-00 Stephen Farrell Added charter milestone "Working Group (rough) consensus on the necessary updates to RFC4880.", due September 2015
2015-06-07
01-00 Stephen Farrell Placed on agenda for telechat - 2015-06-11
2015-06-07
01-00 Stephen Farrell Initial review time expires 2015-06-14
2015-06-07
01-00 Stephen Farrell State changed to Informal IESG review from Approved
2015-06-07
01-00 Stephen Farrell New version available: charter-ietf-openpgp-01-00.txt
2008-03-06
01 (System) New version available: charter-ietf-openpgp-01.txt