Operations and Management Area Working Group
charter-ietf-opsawg-05

Yes

Mahesh Jethanandani
Mohamed Boucadair
Paul Wouters
Éric Vyncke

No Objection

Andy Newton
Deb Cooley
Erik Kline
Gunter Van de Velde
Jim Guichard
Mike Bishop
Roman Danyliw

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04-03 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"

Mahesh Jethanandani
Yes
Mohamed Boucadair
Yes
Paul Wouters
Yes
Éric Vyncke
(was Block) Yes
Comment (2025-04-13 for -04-04) Sent 
Thanks for clarifying the charter, therefore I am clearing my previous BLOCK.
Andy Newton
No Objection
Deb Cooley
No Objection
Erik Kline
No Objection
Comment (2025-04-16 for -04-04) Sent 
# Internet AD comments for charter-ietf-opsawg-04-04
CC @ekline

* comment syntax:
  - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md

## Comments

* "Develop such work items that are not in the scope of an existing WG"

  ->

  "Develop such work items that are not in the scope of an existing OPS
   area WG"?

  It doesn't seem right to declare OPSAWG to be a catch-all for any work
  from anywhere within the IETF.  I feel the existing text leaves open
  that interpretation, though.
Gunter Van de Velde
No Objection
Comment (2025-04-14 for -04-04) Sent 
This charter is refreshingly short, clear in its objective, and keeps things nice and simple.
Just a small comment on the text:

"
Examples include the advancement of documents on the standards track, application statements, maintenance, and minor extensions of documents that were developed in working groups that have concluded, e.g., IPFIX, network or service level YANG modules, and tools for the Operations and Management Area.
"

The word “minor” caught my attention. It might be open to interpretation and could lead to debates later on about what qualifies as "minor" versus something more substantial. Would it make sense to drop that word to avoid any unnecessary restrictions or ambiguity down the line?
Jim Guichard
No Objection
Mike Bishop
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment (2025-04-16 for -04-04) Sent 
This charter needs milestones prior to final approval.