Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure
charter-ietf-opsec-05
Yes
(Joel Jaeggli)
No Objection
(Brian Haberman)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Jari Arkko)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Pete Resnick)
(Richard Barnes)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Ted Lemon)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04-04 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -04-04)
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-09-12 for -04-04)
Unknown
I have no issues with the existing text. However, if the ADs and chairs were to consider adding "privacy" to the scope, I would be very pleased to see it.
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-09-04 for -04-04)
Unknown
Thanks for handling my early review comments.
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-09-12 for -04-04)
Unknown
All my points have been covered by other ADs already.
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04-04)
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04-04)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04-04)
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04-04)
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04-04)
Unknown
Richard Barnes Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04-04)
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-09-05 for -04-04)
Unknown
r/security.In particular,/security. In particular, there's a couple of places where there are two spaces between words - might be datatracker injected. I support Stewart's block, but I'd be happy with the following modification to the 1st sentence (r/must be through a/is by a working group): New protocol work is addressed by a working group chartered for that work, or via one of the individual submission processes.
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04-04)
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-09-12 for -04-04)
Unknown
I agree with Adrian's comment. Adding privacy would here would be a good thing if the WG are willing to take it into account. It'd be a bad thing if the WG didn't care though.
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
(was Block)
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-10-14 for -04-05)
Unknown
Thank you for addressing my concerns.
Ted Lemon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04-04)
Unknown