Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure
charter-ietf-opsec-05

• Ready for external review (04-04)
• Approve (04-05)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04-05 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"

(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) Yes

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection

Maybe I'm pedantic. Take it or leave it

   These are documents that describe the scope of particular operational security
   challenges or problem spaces without necessarily coming to conclusions or
   proposing solutions.

Not sure what is an example of a document that describe the scope of particular operational security challenges or problem spaces "without necessarily coming to conclusions".
There is always a conclusion: there is a problem.

Strike "without necessarily coming to conclusions or"?

(Brian Haberman; former steering group member) No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection

(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection

Under "Informational or Best Current Practices Documents", strike "will be produced."

Under "Non-Goals", strike "is".

(Richard Barnes; former steering group member) No Objection

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection

(Ted Lemon; former steering group member) No Objection