QUIC
charter-ietf-quic-03

• Ready for external review (00-01)
• Approve (00-08)
• Ready for external review (01-00)
• Approve (01-04)
• Ready for external review (02-01)
• Approve (02-02)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01-00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review?"

Alvaro Retana No Objection

Roman Danyliw No Objection

Warren Kumari No Objection

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) Yes

The milestone dates need updating.

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) Yes

(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) Yes

(Adam Roach; former steering group member) No Objection

I note that the paragraph that previously ruled partial reliability and FEC out of scope has been removed. Are these mechanisms to be considered in-scope in this new version of the charter? I would suggest that it should say so explicitly, if such is the intention.

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection

(Benjamin Kaduk; former steering group member) No Objection

I agree with Adam.

The "Note that consensus is required both for changes to the current protocol
mechanisms and retention of current mechanisms. In particular, because
something is in the initial document set does not imply that there is consensus
around the feature or around how it is specified" might be stale at this point.

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection

(Martin Vigoureux; former steering group member) No Objection

(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) No Objection