Ballot for charter-ietf-radext
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06-03 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
# GEN AD review of charter-ietf-radext-06-03 CC @larseggert ## Nits All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you did with these suggestions. ### Typos #### "RADIUS.", paragraph 0 ``` - RADIUS. Any non-backwards compatibility changes with existing RADIUS - ^ - ^^^ + RADIUS. Any non-backwards-compatible changes with existing RADIUS + ^ ^ ``` #### Section 5080, paragraph 0 ``` - be compatible with RFC 3539, with any non-backwards compatibility changes - ^ - ^^^ + be compatible with RFC 3539, with any non-backwards-compatible changes + ^ ^ ``` #### Section 5080, paragraph 1 ``` - The WG will review its existing RFCs' document track categories and - where necessary or useful change document tracks, with minor changes in - ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^ + The WG will review the standards levels of existing RFCs and, + where necessary or useful, propose changes to those levels, with minor changes in + +++++++++ ^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` #### Section 5080, paragraph 5 ``` - - Bring RFC 6614 (RADIUS/TLS), and RFC 7360 (RADIUS/DTLS) to + - Bring RFC 6614 (RADIUS/TLS), and RFC 7360 (RADIUS/DTLS) to the + ++++ ``` #### Section 5080, paragraph 8 ``` - - Improve operations for multi-hop RADIUS networks: e.g. loop detection - ^ - and prevention, a multi-hop Status-Server equivalent with ability to - ^ ^ + - Improve operations for multi-hop RADIUS networks, e.g., loop detection + ^ + + and prevention. A multi-hop Status-Server equivalent with ability to + ^ ^ ``` ## Notes This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the [`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into individual GitHub issues. Review generated by the [`ietf-reviewtool`][IRT]. [ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md [ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments [IRT]: https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool