Routing In Fat Trees
charter-ietf-rift-01

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-05 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"

Deborah Brungard (was No Objection) Yes

(Spencer Dawkins) Yes

Comment (2018-02-07 for -00-05)
No email
send info
Thanks for considering my comments during internal review.

I did have one other suggestion - the first deliverable doesn't actually say it's for a routing protocol. Perhaps

s/A Standards Track specification/A Standards Track routing protocol specification/

?

Alvaro Retana Yes

(Ben Campbell) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

Alissa Cooper No Objection

Suresh Krishnan No Objection

Mirja Kühlewind No Objection

(Terry Manderson) No Objection

Alexey Melnikov No Objection

Comment (2018-02-08 for -00-05)
No email
send info
There is a wrapping problem among one of the items under "A Standards Track specification that will include".

(Kathleen Moriarty) (was Block) No Objection

Comment (2018-02-08 for -00-06)
No email
send info
Thank you for the modifications around security and privacy mitigations in the charter text.

Adam Roach No Objection

(Alia Atlas) Abstain

Comment (2018-02-07 for -00-05)
No email
send info
I'm a proponent - so quite in favor of course.