Yes

Deb Cooley
John Scudder
Paul Wouters

No Objection

Erik Kline
Francesca Palombini
Gunter Van de Velde
Jim Guichard
Murray Kucherawy
Roman Danyliw
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
Éric Vyncke

No Record

Mahesh Jethanandani
Orie Steele
Warren Kumari

Summary: Has enough positions to pass.

Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review? Is this charter ready for approval without external review?"

Deb Cooley
Yes
Comment (2024-11-21 for -05-02) Sent 
To state the complete obvious:  One of the milestones is in the past...
John Scudder
Yes
Comment (2024-11-18 for -05-00) Not sent 
Note: The charter update is deliberately restricted to updating the list of work items to bring it into alignment with current WG reality, with concomitant updates to the milestones.
Paul Wouters
Yes
Comment (2024-11-19 for -05-00) Sent 
NIT:

. RFC 5548, 5673, 5826, and 5876

Due to the omission of "RFC" on the last 3, the datatracker doesn't automatically create links for it like it did for the first one. Please use:

 RFC 5548, RFC 5673, RFC 5826, and RFC 5876
Erik Kline
No Objection
Francesca Palombini
No Objection
Gunter Van de Velde
No Objection
Jim Guichard
No Objection
Murray Kucherawy
No Objection
Comment (2024-11-20 for -05-02) Not sent 
A complete nit:

In "Additional Protocol elements ...", the second word shouldn't be capitalized.
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
No Objection
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Comment (2024-11-20 for -05-02) Sent 
While I am balloting no objection, I strongly suggest to remove concluded WG from the list as `6tisch, ipwave, lwig` are all concluded. Should TVR be added ? BTW, as WG names are acronyms, let's use all uppercase characters ;)
Should RFC 6550 be added next to RPL.

s/WiFi/Wi-Fi/

Finally, I had never heard about "MPL" before reading this charter, an expansion/reference would probably be useful.
Mahesh Jethanandani
No Record
Orie Steele
No Record
Warren Kumari
No Record