Skip to main content

Security Dispatch
charter-ietf-secdispatch-01

Yes

(Kathleen Moriarty)

No Objection

(Alexey Melnikov)
(Alia Atlas)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Alvaro Retana)
(Suresh Krishnan)
(Terry Manderson)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"

Adam Roach Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (2018-03-07 for -00-00) Unknown
Please fix the formatting of lists prior to finalizing the charter.
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (2018-03-07 for -00-00) Unknown
I agreed with Spencer's comment last time, and still do. But it's a nit and I want to see this chartered, so I'm balloting yes.
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -00-00) Unknown

                            
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -00-00) Unknown

                            
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -00-00) Unknown

                            
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -00-00) Unknown

                            
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -00-00) Unknown

                            
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2018-03-08 for -00-00) Unknown
Same remark as for the DHC charter.
It's the exact same version as the "ready for external review" and none of the comments have been addressed, or even answered (the bare minimum). 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-secdispatch/ballot/586411/
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2018-03-06 for -00-00) Unknown
Nit: formatting for "options" is lost on last couple items.
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2018-03-07 for -00-00) Unknown
I had the same comment on -00 when balloting for internal review, but here it is again.

I looked at the proposed charter for SECDISPATCH, and didn't see a reference to https://tools.ietf.orOug/html/rfc7957. I'm guessing from the name that the intention is to charter a SEC-area equivalent to DISPATCH, but that's a guess. If the intention is that this works the same way DISPATCH works, it would be good to know that, and if it's not going to work the way DISPATCH works, it would be helpful to focus on what would be different.

I notice that the numbered and unnumbered lists in the charter start wrapping about two thirds of the way through the lists.
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -00-00) Unknown

                            
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -00-00) Unknown