Stay Home Meet Occasionally Online
charter-ietf-shmoo-02
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01-01 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
Lars Eggert Yes
Alvaro Retana No Objection
All the work items include a sentence about how they are expected to be fulfilled: "with the publication of one or more BCPs", for example. There is no such indication for the second item. Is there a reason for that? Milestones should be included before approval.
Erik Kline No Objection
Martin Duke No Objection
Murray Kucherawy No Objection
Robert Wilton No Objection
I still find the naming/terminology about the different types of meetings to be more confusing that it needs to be: Currently, the charter references 4 types of meetings: in-person, mostly-in-person, hybrid, fully-online. I would at least align in-person and mostly-in-person to the same thing, since I believe that they are meant to be referring to the same thing. It is also not intuitive to me why a mostly-in-person meeting isn't actually also a hybrid meeting. I.e., calling these mostly-online rather than hybrid may help avoid confusion in the future over what a hybrid meeting represents. Regards, Rob
Roman Danyliw No Objection
Zaheduzzaman Sarker No Objection
I agree with Ben's block, I think it should be 3rd item not 4th item that needs discussion on financial aspects. I also think there might be confusion on where to draw the line between a mostly-online and hybrid meeting.
(Benjamin Kaduk; former steering group member) (was Block) No Objection
"Aside from fee structure," could perhaps be "Aside from the fee structure for remote participation", but this version does resolve the internal inconsistency that had triggered my previous BLOCK.