Source Packet Routing in Networking
charter-ietf-spring-02
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01-02 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
Alvaro Retana Yes
(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) Yes
(Martin Vigoureux; former steering group member) Yes
(Adam Roach; former steering group member) No Objection
(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection
I'm not clear on the implications of the text about security considerations. If it turns out that people want to use this cross-domain, will integrity protection be specified as a requirement? Will other security properties be specified as required in that scenario? If it turns out that the threat models require enhancements to the security properties of the underlying protocols, will the segment routing specs still be progressed even as those requirements are pitched over to other WGs, or will they not?
(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection
(Benjamin Kaduk; former steering group member) No Objection
Alissa has some good questions, but I'm confident we can do the right thing. Thanks for the updates to address my previous concerns.
(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection
This sentence is probably unnecessary as always true for all wgs: "The SPRING WG will manage its specific work items by milestones agreed with the responsible Area Director."
(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) No Objection
(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) No Objection