Skip to main content

SIP-TO-XMPP
charter-ietf-stox-01

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
01 (System) Notify list changed from Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com, yana@jitsi.org, stpeter@stpeter.im, Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com to stpeter@stpeter.im
2013-06-14
01 Cindy Morgan New version available: charter-ietf-stox-01.txt
2013-06-14
00-01 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved from IESG review
2013-06-14
00-01 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the charter
2013-06-14
00-01 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2013-06-14
00-01 Cindy Morgan Closed "Ready for external review" ballot
2013-06-14
00-01 Cindy Morgan WG action text was changed
2013-06-14
00-00 Cindy Morgan WG action text was changed
2013-06-14
00-00 Cindy Morgan WG action text was changed
2013-06-13
00-00 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2013-06-13
00-00 Cindy Morgan WG action text was changed
2013-06-13
00-01 Cindy Morgan New version available: charter-ietf-stox-00-01.txt
2013-06-13
00-00 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2013-06-13
00-00 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot comment]
I think it's interesting that the document set is essentially fully realized and fairly mature. this should hopefully be short and sweet.
2013-06-13
00-00 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2013-06-13
00-00 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2013-06-13
00-00 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Lemon
2013-06-13
00-00 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2013-06-13
00-00 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2013-06-13
00-00 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2013-06-13
00-00 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2013-06-13
00-00 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2013-06-13
00-00 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2013-06-12
00-00 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2013-06-12
00-00 Cindy Morgan Created "Approve" ballot
2013-06-12
00-00 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG review from External review
2013-05-31
00-00 Cindy Morgan Telechat date has been changed to 2013-06-13 from 2013-05-30
2013-05-31
00-00 Cindy Morgan State changed to External review from Internal review
2013-05-31
00-00 Cindy Morgan WG review text was changed
2013-05-31
00-00 Cindy Morgan WG review text was changed
2013-05-30
00-00 Richard Barnes [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Richard Barnes
2013-05-30
00-00 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot comment]
echo stephens comment
2013-05-30
00-00 Joel Jaeggli [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli
2013-05-30
00-00 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ted Lemon
2013-05-30
00-00 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
Should the charter be explicit about not accepting other drafts as competing proposals?  It sounds like the drafts are pretty baked but what …
[Ballot comment]
Should the charter be explicit about not accepting other drafts as competing proposals?  It sounds like the drafts are pretty baked but what if somebody shows up with a competing proposal (or is that just not going to happen)?
2013-05-30
00-00 Sean Turner Ballot comment text updated for Sean Turner
2013-05-30
00-00 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

Question: how does this impact on e2e security?
Presumably it entirely breaks it. (Not that e2e
security really exists for either xmpp or …
[Ballot comment]

Question: how does this impact on e2e security?
Presumably it entirely breaks it. (Not that e2e
security really exists for either xmpp or simple, but
I've not read these drafts.) Would it be reasonable to
ask that the WG consider how this work impacts on
in-work (the xmpp wg are doing work on e2e) or future
e2e security mechanisms and in the event that there is
no working solution for that (which is probable I
guess) that the WG consider how that fact ought be
handled?
2013-05-30
00-00 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2013-05-29
00-00 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2013-05-29
00-00 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2013-05-28
00-00 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2013-05-28
00-00 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2013-05-27
00-00 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2013-05-26
00-00 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2013-05-22
00-00 Pete Resnick [Ballot comment]
I think this WG should be kept on a *very* tight and short timeline. Most of the work is (AFAICT) already mostly baked.
2013-05-22
00-00 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2013-05-22
00-00 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2013-05-21
00-00 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot comment]
I was glad to see this work taking place, and I'm glad to see it coming into an IETF working group.
2013-05-21
00-00 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2013-05-21
00-00 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
This seems like very worthwhile effort.  It looks like pretty short-term work: I might like to see the proposed schedule.

Also, the preamble …
[Ballot comment]
This seems like very worthwhile effort.  It looks like pretty short-term work: I might like to see the proposed schedule.

Also, the preamble talks about need to map in both directions, but this working group is only addressing one direction, yes?  Is there any plan for xmpp-to-sip mapping?
2013-05-21
00-00 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2013-05-20
00-00 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2013-05-20
00-00 Gonzalo Camarillo Placed on agenda for telechat - 2013-05-30
2013-05-20
00-00 Gonzalo Camarillo WG action text was changed
2013-05-20
00-00 Gonzalo Camarillo WG review text was changed
2013-05-20
00-00 Gonzalo Camarillo Created "Ready for external review" ballot
2013-05-20
00-00 Gonzalo Camarillo State changed to Internal review from Informal IESG review
2013-05-15
00-00 Gonzalo Camarillo Notification list changed to Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com, yana@jitsi.org, stpeter@stpeter.im, Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com from Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com, yana@jitsi.org, stpeter@stpeter.im
2013-05-15
00-00 Gonzalo Camarillo Notification list changed to Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com, yana@jitsi.org, stpeter@stpeter.im
2013-05-15
00-00 Gonzalo Camarillo Responsible AD changed to Gonzalo Camarillo
2013-04-12
00-00 Gonzalo Camarillo Initial review time expires 2013-04-19
2013-04-12
00-00 Gonzalo Camarillo State changed to Informal IESG review from Not currently under review
2013-04-12
00-00 Gonzalo Camarillo New version available: charter-ietf-stox-00-00.txt