Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01-03 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
(Ralph Droms) Yes
(Brian Haberman) Yes
(Ron Bonica) No Objection
(Stewart Bryant) No Objection
(Benoît Claise) (was Block) No Objection
Comment (2013-02-20 for -01-04)
Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS.
(Wesley Eddy) No Objection
(Adrian Farrel) No Objection
Comment (2013-01-22 for -01-03)
Two minor points I hope can be looked at... 1. I continue to hate the use of "freely" in the first paragraph. Can you consider "readily"? 2. We have a rule and a work item that appear to be in conflict: As a rule, deployment scenarios considered by the working group shall include IPv6-only nodes and networks. ...and... * Provisioning methods to signal a dual-stack host to disable or depreference the use of IPv4 I'm not saying which is wrong, but one of them must be.
(Stephen Farrell) No Objection
(Russ Housley) No Objection
(Barry Leiba) No Objection
(Pete Resnick) No Objection
(Robert Sparks) No Objection
(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection
Comment (2013-01-21 for -01-03)
Question for clarification: What is a 'provisioning method' mentioned in this item: "Provisioning methods to signal a dual-stack host to disable or depreference the use of IPv4."?