TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions
charter-ietf-tcpm-10
Yes
(Adam Roach)
(Alexey Melnikov)
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
(Alvaro Retana)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Magnus Westerlund)
- Approve (06-00)
- Ready for external review (07-00)
- Approve (07-01)
- Ready w/o external review (08-00)
- Ready for external review (09-00)
- Approve (09-01)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08-00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review? Is this charter ready for approval without external review?"
Éric Vyncke
Yes
Comment
(2020-03-09 for -08-00)
Sent
Minor changes only about MPTCP. Just wondering why the congestion control is mentioned for MPTCP while later in the text, it is clear that TCPM is also in charge of congestion control. -éric
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Adam Roach Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -08-00)
Not sent
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -08-00)
Not sent
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2020-03-09 for -08-00)
Not sent
Absolutely, and no external review needed.
Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2020-03-11 for -08-00)
Not sent
Agreed that external review is not needed.
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2020-03-09 for -08-00)
Sent
This is a minor change accompany the closure of MPTCP (in the next days). While we all (ADs and chairs) agree that working on minor extensions or fixes for MPTCP is in scope already with the old charter text, this update is intended to also make this explicitly clear to e.g. people from outside the IETF. Therefore I would like to request to approve this small recharter without external review.
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -08-00)
Not sent
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -08-00)
Not sent
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -08-00)
Not sent
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2020-03-11 for -08-00)
Not sent
Fine to go without external review.