Ballot for charter-ietf-tram
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01-00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this charter ready for external review? Is this charter ready for approval without external review?"
My substantive point has to do with the scoping and use cases being dealt with in TRAM. I feel like some of the confusion over the TRAM drafts has related to whether the mechanisms being specified are expected to be used only within the WebRTC context or outside of it as well, for STUN/TURN generally. I'd like to see a commitment to clarity in this regard called out in the charter. E.g., "In making updates to TURN and STUN, the working group will clearly document the motivations and implications of the updates both within the WebRTC context and more broadly" or something like that.
I agree with Alissa's confusion (the tracker says internal review but the ballot says external) and comment. Also, if this is for external review, some milestones would be nice.