WebTransport
charter-ietf-webtrans-01
Yes
(Adam Roach)
(Barry Leiba)
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
(Alissa Cooper)
(Alvaro Retana)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Martin Vigoureux)
(Suresh Krishnan)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-02 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Comment
(2020-03-02 for -00-02)
Sent
This looks like an interesting work to be done. Just as non-blocking comments: 1) the milestones are really aggressive (and perhaps unrealistic) 2) when talking about "owners of the WebTransport API" this would be worth adding a reference to those owners. Good luck and fair winds to this potential new WG -éric
Adam Roach Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -00-02)
Not sent
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -00-02)
Not sent
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2020-03-03 for -00-02)
Not sent
This version of the Charter is much better than -00.
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-02)
Not sent
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-02)
Not sent
Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2020-03-04 for -00-02)
Not sent
It's left pretty implicit that this work expects to tie into HTTP and use QUIC, but perhaps we don't need to constrain ourselves in that manner.
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-02)
Not sent
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-02)
Not sent
Martin Vigoureux Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-02)
Not sent
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2020-03-05 for -00-02)
Sent
I agree with Ben that it would seem appropriate to mention HTTP somewhere in the charter. I'm also a bit worried that this work is so closely coupled to the work on the WebTransport API of another SoD that is further still in an unclear state. But I also don't have a good solution to that. Probably correct to start with requirement in this case... I would like to see the relationship of this new group to taps clarified in the charter!
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-02)
Not sent