Skip to main content

IETF conflict review for draft-benecke-cfbl-address-header
conflict-review-benecke-cfbl-address-header-00

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2023-04-17
00 Cindy Morgan
The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: Eliot Lear ,
    draft-benecke-cfbl-address-header@ietf.org,
    rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org
Cc: IETF-Announce ,
    …
The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: Eliot Lear ,
    draft-benecke-cfbl-address-header@ietf.org,
    rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org
Cc: IETF-Announce ,
    The IESG ,
    iana@iana.org
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-benecke-cfbl-address-header-10

The IESG has completed a review of draft-benecke-cfbl-address-header-10
consistent with RFC5742.

The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Complaint Feedback Loop
Address Header'  as an Experimental
RFC.

The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and
IETF work.

The IESG would also like the Independent Submissions Editor to review the
comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or
not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both
the ballot and the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-benecke-cfbl-address-header/

A URL of the reviewed Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-benecke-cfbl-address-header/

The process for such documents is described at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary



2023-04-17
00 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the conflict review response
2023-04-17
00 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2023-04-17
00 Cindy Morgan Conflict Review State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement sent from Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent
2023-04-13
00 Cindy Morgan Conflict Review State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation
2023-04-13
00 Andrew Alston [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Andrew Alston
2023-04-12
00 Roman Danyliw [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Roman Danyliw
2023-04-11
00 Paul Wouters [Ballot comment]
note it uses the "Network Working Group". Is that still a valid reference to use?
2023-04-11
00 Paul Wouters [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Paul Wouters
2023-04-10
00 Jim Guichard [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jim Guichard
2023-04-07
00 Éric Vyncke [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Éric Vyncke
2023-04-06
00 John Scudder [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for John Scudder
2023-04-04
00 Erik Kline [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Erik Kline
2023-03-27
00 Murray Kucherawy [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Murray Kucherawy
2023-03-27
00 Murray Kucherawy Created "Approve" ballot
2023-03-27
00 Murray Kucherawy Conflict Review State changed to IESG Evaluation from AD Review
2023-03-27
00 Murray Kucherawy New version available: conflict-review-benecke-cfbl-address-header-00.txt
2023-03-13
00 Murray Kucherawy Placed on agenda for telechat - 2023-04-13
2023-03-13
00 Lars Eggert Conflict Review State changed to AD Review from Needs Shepherd
2023-03-13
00 Lars Eggert Removed from agenda for telechat
2023-03-13
00 Lars Eggert Shepherding AD changed to Murray Kucherawy
2023-03-02
00 Cindy Morgan Placed on agenda for telechat - 2023-03-16
2023-03-02
00 Eliot Lear IETF conflict review requested