IETF conflict review for draft-briscoe-docsis-q-protection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"
This document is adjacent to the L4S work in TSVWG. One nit: In (1.2), a definition refers to "marking all the packet's bytes." I'm not sure what the authors mean; perhaps s/bytes/ECN bits? Reviewing the pseudocode in detail was not necessary for the conflict review, and I did not do so.