IETF conflict review for draft-cordeiro-experience-mapt
conflict-review-cordeiro-experience-mapt-00

The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: "Nevil Brownlee" , draft-cordeiro-experience-mapt@ietf.org
Cc: The IESG , , 
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-cordeiro-experience-mapt-04

The IESG has completed a review of draft-cordeiro-experience-mapt-04
consistent with RFC5742.


The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Experience from MAP-T
Testing'  as an Informational RFC.


The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
softwire, but this relationship does not prevent publishing.

The IESG would also like the RFC-Editor to review the comments in the
datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they
merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the
ballot and the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-cordeiro-experience-mapt/

A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cordeiro-experience-mapt/

The process for such documents is described at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary

[Ballot comment]

A comment for the authors/ISE: it'd have been nice if this
had considered DNS and in particular DNSSEC - I forget
if MAP-T impacts on that or not. It also looks a little odd
that there's no mail or IM tests in the test set. But overall,
good to see people doing these kinds of test.