IETF conflict review for draft-donley-behave-deterministic-cgn
conflict-review-donley-behave-deterministic-cgn-00
Yes
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Richard Barnes)
(Spencer Dawkins)
No Objection
(Alia Atlas)
(Barry Leiba)
(Brian Haberman)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Pete Resnick)
(Ted Lemon)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Richard Barnes Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2014-10-27)
Unknown
I'll go with Spencer's assessment
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2014-10-29)
Unknown
Taking into account that draft-sivakumar-behave-nat-logging, referred to in the draft, is now draft-ietf-behave-ipfix-nat-logging-04, I wonder whether we shouldn't add BEHAVE in " that this work is related to IETF work done in the SUNSET4 WG". On the other hand, BEHAVE is now closed. Not too sure. Regards, Benoit
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ted Lemon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown