IETF conflict review for draft-historic-simple-ip
conflict-review-historic-simple-ip-00
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2018-10-15
|
00 | Amy Vezza | The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: Adrian Farrel , rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org, draft-historic-simple-ip@ietf.org Cc: IETF-Announce , … The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: Adrian Farrel , rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org, draft-historic-simple-ip@ietf.org Cc: IETF-Announce , The IESG , iana@iana.org Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-historic-simple-ip-03 The IESG has completed a review of draft-historic-simple-ip-03 consistent with RFC5742. The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Simple Internet Protocol (SIP) Specification' as an Historic RFC. The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in the 6man working group, but this relationship does not prevent publishing. The IESG would also like the Independent Submissions Editor to review the comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the history log. The IESG review is documented at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-historic-simple-ip/ A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-historic-simple-ip/ The process for such documents is described at https://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html Thank you, The IESG Secretary |
2018-10-15
|
00 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the conflict review response |
2018-10-15
|
00 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2018-10-15
|
00 | Amy Vezza | Conflict Review State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement sent from Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent |
2018-10-11
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | Conflict Review State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation |
2018-10-11
|
00 | Ignas Bagdonas | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ignas Bagdonas |
2018-10-10
|
00 | Martin Vigoureux | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Martin Vigoureux |
2018-10-10
|
00 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot comment] I initially wondered if this needed some clarification so it could not be confused with that other ''SIP", but I cannot think of … [Ballot comment] I initially wondered if this needed some clarification so it could not be confused with that other ''SIP", but I cannot think of anything useful to accomplish that. |
2018-10-10
|
00 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ben Campbell |
2018-10-10
|
00 | Benjamin Kaduk | [Ballot comment] I could see a case for mentioning ipngwg in addition to (or instead of) 6man. I am somewhat curious whether there are plans … [Ballot comment] I could see a case for mentioning ipngwg in addition to (or instead of) 6man. I am somewhat curious whether there are plans to similarly republish SIP-ADDR. |
2018-10-10
|
00 | Benjamin Kaduk | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benjamin Kaduk |
2018-10-10
|
00 | Deborah Brungard | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard |
2018-10-10
|
00 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
2018-10-10
|
00 | Mirja Kühlewind | [Ballot comment] I'm fine with the reply for the conflicit review (because I think it is correct). However, I do wonder about the value of … [Ballot comment] I'm fine with the reply for the conflicit review (because I think it is correct). However, I do wonder about the value of publishing this. If we actually think there is a value in publishing this, we could also publish this as historic in the IETF stream. |
2018-10-10
|
00 | Mirja Kühlewind | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mirja Kühlewind |
2018-10-09
|
00 | Alvaro Retana | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana |
2018-10-08
|
00 | Adam Roach | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adam Roach |
2018-10-08
|
00 | Suresh Krishnan | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan |
2018-10-08
|
00 | Suresh Krishnan | Created "Approve" ballot |
2018-10-08
|
00 | Suresh Krishnan | Conflict Review State changed to IESG Evaluation from AD Review |
2018-10-08
|
00 | Suresh Krishnan | New version available: conflict-review-historic-simple-ip-00.txt |
2018-09-24
|
00 | Suresh Krishnan | Telechat date has been changed to 2018-10-11 from 2018-09-27 |
2018-09-11
|
00 | Suresh Krishnan | Telechat date has been changed to 2018-09-27 from 2018-09-13 |
2018-09-10
|
00 | Alissa Cooper | Conflict Review State changed to AD Review from Needs Shepherd |
2018-09-10
|
00 | Alissa Cooper | Shepherding AD changed to Suresh Krishnan |
2018-09-06
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2018-09-13 |
2018-09-06
|
00 | Adrian Farrel | IETF conflict review requested |