Skip to main content

IETF conflict review for draft-historic-simple-ip
conflict-review-historic-simple-ip-00

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2018-10-15
00 Amy Vezza
The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: Adrian Farrel ,
    rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org,
    draft-historic-simple-ip@ietf.org
Cc: IETF-Announce ,
    …
The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: Adrian Farrel ,
    rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org,
    draft-historic-simple-ip@ietf.org
Cc: IETF-Announce ,
    The IESG ,
    iana@iana.org
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-historic-simple-ip-03

The IESG has completed a review of draft-historic-simple-ip-03 consistent
with RFC5742.

The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Simple Internet Protocol
(SIP) Specification'  as an Historic RFC.

The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in the
6man working group, but this relationship does not prevent publishing.

The IESG would also like the Independent Submissions Editor to review the
comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or
not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both
the ballot and the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-historic-simple-ip/

A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-historic-simple-ip/

The process for such documents is described at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary



2018-10-15
00 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the conflict review response
2018-10-15
00 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2018-10-15
00 Amy Vezza Conflict Review State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement sent from Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent
2018-10-11
00 Cindy Morgan Conflict Review State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation
2018-10-11
00 Ignas Bagdonas [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ignas Bagdonas
2018-10-10
00 Martin Vigoureux [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Martin Vigoureux
2018-10-10
00 Ben Campbell
[Ballot comment]
I initially wondered if this needed some clarification so it could not be confused with that other ''SIP", but I cannot think of …
[Ballot comment]
I initially wondered if this needed some clarification so it could not be confused with that other ''SIP", but I cannot think of anything useful to accomplish that.
2018-10-10
00 Ben Campbell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ben Campbell
2018-10-10
00 Benjamin Kaduk
[Ballot comment]
I could see a case for mentioning ipngwg in addition to (or instead of) 6man.

I am somewhat curious whether there are plans …
[Ballot comment]
I could see a case for mentioning ipngwg in addition to (or instead of) 6man.

I am somewhat curious whether there are plans to similarly republish SIP-ADDR.
2018-10-10
00 Benjamin Kaduk [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benjamin Kaduk
2018-10-10
00 Deborah Brungard [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard
2018-10-10
00 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2018-10-10
00 Mirja Kühlewind
[Ballot comment]
I'm fine with the reply for the conflicit review (because I think it is correct). However, I do wonder about the value of …
[Ballot comment]
I'm fine with the reply for the conflicit review (because I think it is correct). However, I do wonder about the value of publishing this. If we actually think there is a value in publishing this, we could also publish this as historic in the IETF stream.
2018-10-10
00 Mirja Kühlewind [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mirja Kühlewind
2018-10-09
00 Alvaro Retana [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana
2018-10-08
00 Adam Roach [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adam Roach
2018-10-08
00 Suresh Krishnan [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan
2018-10-08
00 Suresh Krishnan Created "Approve" ballot
2018-10-08
00 Suresh Krishnan Conflict Review State changed to IESG Evaluation from AD Review
2018-10-08
00 Suresh Krishnan New version available: conflict-review-historic-simple-ip-00.txt
2018-09-24
00 Suresh Krishnan Telechat date has been changed to 2018-10-11 from 2018-09-27
2018-09-11
00 Suresh Krishnan Telechat date has been changed to 2018-09-27 from 2018-09-13
2018-09-10
00 Alissa Cooper Conflict Review State changed to AD Review from Needs Shepherd
2018-09-10
00 Alissa Cooper Shepherding AD changed to Suresh Krishnan
2018-09-06
00 Cindy Morgan Placed on agenda for telechat - 2018-09-13
2018-09-06
00 Adrian Farrel IETF conflict review requested