Skip to main content

IETF conflict review for draft-irtf-cfrg-hpke
conflict-review-irtf-cfrg-hpke-00

Yes

(Erik Kline)

No Objection

Éric Vyncke
(Alvaro Retana)
(John Scudder)
(Lars Eggert)
(Martin Duke)
(Martin Vigoureux)
(Murray Kucherawy)
(Robert Wilton)
(Zaheduzzaman Sarker)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"

Roman Danyliw
Yes
Comment (2021-10-20) Not sent
To be clear, existing IETF work does normatively reference this document -- draft-ietf-tls-esni-13 (TLS WG) and draft-ietf-mls-protocol-11 (MLS WG).  However, I'm recommending the proposed conflict review text because these are not complimentary relationships.  The IETF is building upon the cryptographic mechanisms described here.  This approach continues the long standing practice of IRTF defining and publishing the new cryptography, and the IETF standardizing protocols that use it.
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (2021-10-25) Sent
It's unfortunate that there is no RFC 5742 "yes, please!" response, so
"no conflict" will have to do.


It may be worth discussing the security considerations when a given
private key is shared/used by a cooperating group of servers rather than
a single one, especially if there is any chance that a given KEM
key might be used in both "sender" and "recipient" roles (which is
stated to be a valid scenario in the discussion of the security goals).
To some extent this resembles the Key-Compromise Impersonation scenario,
but might be worth mentioning directly as a route by which key
compromise could occur even without compromise of a given endpoint
itself.
Erik Kline Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Not sent

                            
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Not sent

                            
John Scudder Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Not sent

                            
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Not sent

                            
Martin Duke Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Not sent

                            
Martin Vigoureux Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Not sent

                            
Murray Kucherawy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Not sent

                            
Robert Wilton Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Not sent

                            
Zaheduzzaman Sarker Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Not sent