IETF conflict review for draft-irtf-hrpc-guidelines
conflict-review-irtf-hrpc-guidelines-00

The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: Colin Perkins ,
    Internet Research Steering Group ,
    draft-irtf-hrpc-guidelines@ietf.org,
    hrpc-chairs@ietf.org,
    irtf-chair@irtf.org,
    mknodel@cdt.org
Cc: IETF-Announce ,
    The IESG ,
    iana@iana.org
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-hrpc-guidelines-21

The IESG has completed a review of draft-irtf-hrpc-guidelines-21 consistent
with RFC5742.

The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Guidelines for Human Rights
Protocol and Architecture Considerations'
as an Informational RFC.

The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and
IETF work.

The IESG would also like the IRTF to review the comments in the datatracker
related to this document and determine whether or not they merit
incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and
the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-irtf-hrpc-guidelines/

A URL of the reviewed Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-hrpc-guidelines/

The process for such documents is described in RFC 5743

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary

[Ballot discuss]
** Abstract
  It has been reviewed, tried,
  and tested by both by the research group as well as by researchers
  and practitioners from outside the research group (for example see:
  https://gitlab.com/hr-rt/documents).

The above text references a repository that has a number examples where recommended changes to IETF-stream documents are described based on the human-right review.  For example:

-- SUIT documents in https://gitlab.com/hr-rt/documents/-/blob/master/HR-RT%20Review%20of%20draft-ietf-suit-*

-- REGEXT documents in https://gitlab.com/hr-rt/documents/-/blob/master/HR-RT%20Review%20of%20draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode?ref_type=heads

I have not tracked down whether this recommendations were incorporated.  The easy remedy would be omit this reference.