IETF conflict review for draft-irtf-icnrg-ccnxmessages
conflict-review-irtf-icnrg-ccnxmessages-00

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"

Spencer Dawkins Yes

Suresh Krishnan Yes

Alvaro Retana Yes

Adam Roach Yes

Deborah Brungard No Objection

Ben Campbell No Objection

Comment (2019-01-09)
A couple of editorial comments about the draft itself:

- It looks like some abbreviations would benefit from expansion on first mention (e.g. CCNx).

- Should we start encouraging individual submissions that use normative language to move to the RFC 8174 boilerplate?

Alissa Cooper No Objection

Benjamin Kaduk No Objection

Mirja K├╝hlewind No Objection

Terry Manderson No Objection

Martin Vigoureux No Objection