IETF conflict review for draft-irtf-icnrg-ccnxmessages

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"

(Spencer Dawkins) Yes

(Suresh Krishnan) Yes

Alvaro Retana Yes

(Adam Roach) Yes

Deborah Brungard No Objection

(Ben Campbell) No Objection

Comment (2019-01-09)
A couple of editorial comments about the draft itself:

- It looks like some abbreviations would benefit from expansion on first mention (e.g. CCNx).

- Should we start encouraging individual submissions that use normative language to move to the RFC 8174 boilerplate?

Alissa Cooper No Objection

Benjamin Kaduk No Objection

(Mirja K├╝hlewind) No Objection

(Terry Manderson) No Objection

Martin Vigoureux No Objection