IETF conflict review for draft-irtf-icnrg-icntraceroute
conflict-review-irtf-icnrg-icntraceroute-01

Yes

Roman Danyliw

No Objection

Erik Kline
Jim Guichard
John Scudder
Murray Kucherawy
Paul Wouters
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
Éric Vyncke
(Andrew Alston)
(Martin Duke)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"

Roman Danyliw
Yes
Erik Kline
No Objection
Jim Guichard
No Objection
John Scudder
No Objection
Murray Kucherawy
No Objection
Paul Wouters
No Objection
Zaheduzzaman Sarker
No Objection
Comment (2023-08-09 for -00) Not sent 
Supporting Martin's discuss and I think this conflict review should at least indicate IPPM as related working group.
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Comment (2023-08-01 for -00) Sent 
Beside using BCP14 w/o the right template for an experimental protocol ;-)

I would also have cited IPPM & INTAREA as related IETF WG (cfr conflict-review-irtf-icnrg-icnping-00).

But, indeed the core conflict review status is: no conflict with IETF work.
Andrew Alston Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -00) Not sent 

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Martin Duke Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            (was Discuss)
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (2023-08-10)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Sent
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                
Thanks for resolving my DISCUSS.